Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./495/2026 of JAHADUL ISLAM ALIAS JAHADUR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR on 18 March 2026
GAHC010031502026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./495/2026 JAHADUL ISLAM ALIAS JAHADUR S/O JAMUN ALI R/O PURBA CHANMARI P.S. NORTH LAKHIMPUR, DIST. LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REP BY THE
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010031502026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./495/2026
JAHADUL ISLAM ALIAS JAHADUR
S/O JAMUN ALI
R/O PURBA CHANMARI
P.S. NORTH LAKHIMPUR,
DIST. LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
REP BY THE PP, ASSAM
2:MD. ABDUL RAHMAN
S/O LATE AHEDUA SHAIKH
R/O PURBA CHANMARI
P.S. NORTH LAKHIMPUR
DIST.LAKHIMPUR
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A AHMED, MISS. P M AHMED
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MS. T PARASHAR(AMICUS CURIAE)
B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
19.03.2026
Page No.# 2/2 Heard Mr. A. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. The scanned copy of the TCR called for has been received. This is an application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Special POCSO Case No. 76/2025 arising out of North Lakhimpur P.S. Case No. 126/2025 registered under Section 87/64 of BNS r/w Section 4 POCSO Act, which is pending before the Court of learned Special Judge (POCSO), Lakhimpur, North Lakhimpur. Mr. R.J. Baruah, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor is present and objects to the bail. Ms. T. Parashar, learned Amicus Curiae submitted that even before the trial court, the victim and the informant had objected to the bail of the petitioner. The TCR reveals that statements of two witnesses have been recorded and the petitioner has been implicated. Having regard to the stage of the trial and upon due consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant bail at this point of time to the petitioner. Bail Application accordingly rejected at this Stage. JUDGE Comparing Assistant