Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Crl.)/110/2026 of RAJ RAM SINGH Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR on 16 March 2026
GAHC010015072026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/110/2026 RAJ RAM SINGH SON OF LATE AGYA RAM SINGH, R/O RAILWAY COLONY, GEETANAGAR, P.S.- GEETANAGAR, DIST- KAMRUP (METRO), ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND
GAHC010015072026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/110/2026
RAJ RAM SINGH
SON OF LATE AGYA RAM SINGH, R/O RAILWAY COLONY, GEETANAGAR, P.S.- GEETANAGAR, DIST- KAMRUP (METRO), ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
2:SUMARI KHATOON
WIFE OF MAHAR ALI
R/O HATIGARH CHARIALI
P.S.- GEETANAGAR
DIST- KAMRUP (METRO)
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. B SARMA (LEGAL AID COUNSEL), Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : ST.Rev./0/0
SRI RAJ RAM SINGH
SON OF LATE AGYA RAM SINGH
R/O RAILWAY COLONY GEETANAGAR
KAMRUP METRO
ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PP ASSAM
2:SUMARI KHATOON
WIFE OF MAHAR ALI
R/O HATIGARH CHARIALI
GEETANAGAR
KAMRUP METRO
ASSAM
------------
Advocate for : MS BIJITA SARMA
Advocate for : appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 17/03/2026 (Michael Zothankhuma, J) Heard Ms. B. Sarma, learned Legal Aid Counsel for the applicant, who submits that there is a delay of 426 days in preferring the appeal against the impugned judgement dated 27/09/2024 and the subsequent order dated 01/10/2024, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, POCSO, Kamrup (M), in Sessions (Special) Case No. 226/2023, convicting the applicant/appellant under section 6 of the POCSO Act read with section 376 AB of IPC. Mr. R.R. Kaushik, learned APP, submits that he has got no objection to the delay being condoned. None has appeared for the respondent no. 2. On account of the above, the delay of 426 days is condoned. Registry to register the appeal.
IA is accordingly disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant