Armed Forces Tribunal
Ex Sep Ajay Singh vs UOI & Others on 4 November 2025
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, JAIPUR
25.
OA 42/2024
Ex Sep Ajay Singh
…. Applicant
Versus
UOI & Others
…. Respondents
For Applicant
: Ms. Anjali Minocha, Advocate
For Respondents
: Mr. Abhishek Singh, Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVERDHAN BARDHAR, MEMBER (J)
HON’BLE MR. SANJIV MITTAL, MEMBER (A)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
04.11.2025
1. During the course of arguments, Learned Counsel for the Respondents submits that the Applicant is not eligible for grant of Disability Pension as the disability with which he was affected was considered as NANA. However, in the meantime, Respondents have granted him Invalid Pension in terms of Govt of India, Ministry of Defence letter No 12(06)/2019/D (Pen/Pol) dt 16.07.2020 as he was considered unfit for military as well as Civil re-employment and was discharged after 04.01.2019. A copy of PPO No 206202300792 was alsoplaced on record.The Counsel for the Applicant raised no objection to this and prayed that a copy of PPO issued in this regard be supplied to her.
2. In view of Invalid Pension having been granted in favour of the Applicant, the OA is dismissed as infructuous with a direction to the Respondents that a copy of the relevant PPO be supplied to the Counsel for the Applicant on an urgent basis.
3. File be consigned to records.
(SANJIV MITTAL)
(GOVERDHAN BARDHAR) MEMBER (A)
MEMBER (J)
Ssy/-