Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/153/2017 of SMT. RANJITA BORPATRA GOHAIN Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM and 5 ORS. on 12 March 2026
GAHC010231962017 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/153/2017 SMT. RANJITA BORPATRA GOHAIN ASSTT. TEACHER OF NO. 216 SANTAPUR KANDALI L.P. SCHOOL, R/O VILL- AMOLAPATI,WARD NO. 1, P.O. and P.S. BIHPURIA, DIST. LAKHIMPUR,
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010231962017
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/153/2017
SMT. RANJITA BORPATRA GOHAIN
ASSTT. TEACHER OF NO. 216 SANTAPUR KANDALI L.P. SCHOOL, R/O
VILL- AMOLAPATI,WARD NO. 1, P.O. and P.S. BIHPURIA, DIST. LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM and 5 ORS.
REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. FO ASSAM, EDUCATION ELEMENTARY DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6.
2:THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION
ASSAM
KAHILIPARA
GUWAHATI -19
DIST. KAMRUP M
ASSAM.
3:THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER
LAKHIMPUR
DIST. LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM.
4:THE BLOCK ELEMENTARY EDUCAITON OFFICER
NORTH LAKHIMPUR BLOCK
DIST. LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM.
5:THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS
Page No.# 2/2
LAKHIMPUR DIST. LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM.
6:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI -6
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.H MAZUMDER, MR.N BORAH
Advocate for the Respondent : MR.B GOGOI, SC, EDUCATION,SC, FINANCE
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
13.03.2026 In view of the order dated 11.03.2026 passed by the Commissioner and Secretary in the Department of School Education, Assam, Mr. N. Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that no further adjudication in the present writ petition is required in its present form. However, he prays for liberty to approach this Court again in case any grievance remains unaddressed with regard to the petitioner having been accommodated as a Tutor. Granting such liberty, this writ petition is closed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant