Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./128/2026 of PUSHPENDRA HAZARIKA Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 8 March 2026
GAHC010281582025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./128/2026 PUSHPENDRA HAZARIKA S/O SRI MRIGEN HAZARIKA R/O PANICHOKUA DERKURIA GAON, PO- PANICHOKUA, PS- PULIBOR, DIST. JORHAT, ASSAM, PIN-785006. 2: BHREEGU
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010281582025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./128/2026
PUSHPENDRA HAZARIKA
S/O SRI MRIGEN HAZARIKA
R/O PANICHOKUA DERKURIA GAON, PO- PANICHOKUA, PS- PULIBOR, DIST. JORHAT, ASSAM, PIN-785006.
2: BHREEGU HAZARIKA
PANICHOKUA DERKURIA GAON
PO- PANICHOKUA
PS- PULIBO
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
2:BHREEGU HAZARIKA
SON OF SRI PUSHPENDRA HAZARIKA
R/O PANICHOKUA DERKURIA GAON
PO- PANICHOKUA
PS- PULIBOR
DIST. JORHAT
ASSAM
PIN-785006
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R PHUKAN, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Page No.# 2/2 Date : 09.03.2026 Heard Mr. R. Phukan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R.J. Baruah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. The trial Court record has been received and perused. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the prayer for bail of atleast the petitioner No.2, who is a student may be considered at this stge. I have gone through the records. Going by the nature of evidence and the progress of the trial and the number of witnesses, who remain to be examined, this Court does not find it a fit case to grant bail to the petitioner at this stge. Bail Application of both the petitioners is hereby rejected at this stage. Bail Application is disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant