Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Crl.)/234/2026 of DAMBA RABIDAS Vs STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR on 8 March 2026
GAHC010023912026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/234/2026 DAMBA RABIDAS S/O LATE DHENUWA RABIDAS, VILLAGE-BURALIKSON, P.S.- KAMARGAON, DISTRICT - GOLAGHAT, ASSAM. VERSUS STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010023912026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/234/2026
DAMBA RABIDAS
S/O LATE DHENUWA RABIDAS, VILLAGE-BURALIKSON, P.S.- KAMARGAON, DISTRICT - GOLAGHAT, ASSAM.
VERSUS
STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
2:AJIT ROBIDAS
S/O LATE KALI PRASAD ROBI DAS
RESIDENT OF CHARANGIA
DIST- GOLAGHAT
PIN-785621
ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S J SARMAH, MR D CHUTIA,J BHUYAN,MR. P C R DAS
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : ST.Rev./0/0
SRI DAMBA RABIDAS
VILLAGEBURALIKSON
P.S.KAMARGAON
DISTRICT - GOLAGHAT
ASSAM
VERSUS
STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
ASSAM.
Page No.# 2/2
2:SRI AJIT ROBIDAS
RESIDENT OF CHARANGIA
DIST- GOLAGHAT
PIN-785621
ASSAM.
------------
Advocate for : MR SHYMAL JYOTI SARMAH
Advocate for : appearing for STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 09/03/2026 (Michael Zothankhuma, J) Mr. S. J. Sarmah, learned counsel for the applicant submits that there is a delay of 166 days in filing the appeal against the judgement and order dated 25/06/2025 passed by the learned Special Judge, POCSO at Golaghat, in Special (POCSO) Case No. 43/2022, by which the applicant has been convicted under section 4(2) of the POCSO Act. Mr. R.R. Kaushik, learned APP, Assam, submits that he has got no objection to the delay being condoned. In view of the submission made by the counsel for the State, the delay is accordingly condoned. Registry to list the appeal. IA is accordingly disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant