Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Crl.)/408/2024 of MOKLISH AHMED BARBHUIYA Vs STATE OF ASSAM on 26 February 2026
GAHC010067782024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/408/2024 MOKLISH AHMED BARBHUIYA S/O ABIDUR RAHMAN BARBHUIYA VILL.- DHONEHARI PT. I P.S.- SONAI DIST.- CACHAR ASSAM. VERSUS STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY P.P. ASSAM.
GAHC010067782024
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/408/2024
MOKLISH AHMED BARBHUIYA
S/O ABIDUR RAHMAN BARBHUIYA
VILL.- DHONEHARI PT. I
P.S.- SONAI
DIST.- CACHAR
ASSAM.
VERSUS
STATE OF ASSAM
REP. BY P.P.
ASSAM.
------------
Advocate for : MR D TALUKDAR
Advocate for : PP
ASSAM appearing for STATE OF ASSAM
Linked Case : Crl.A./122/2024
MOKLISH AHMED BARBHUIYA
S/O ABIDUR RAHMAN BARBHUIYA,
VILL.- DHONEHARI PT. I, P.S.- SONAI, DIST.- CACHAR, ASSAM.
VERSUS
STATE OF ASSAM
REP. BY P.P., ASSAM.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR D TALUKDAR, MR. P DAIMARY,MR. R. KARIM,J
MEDHI,MS. N M LONGKENG,MS P SAIKIA,MR P CHOUDHURY,MR. K MOHAMMED
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 27.02.2026 (M. Zothankhuma, J) Mr. P.K. Deka, learned counsel appears for the applicant-appellant, while Ms. B. Bhuyan, learned Sr. Counsel and Addl. P.P. appears for the State.
2. This is an application under Section 389(2) of Cr.P.C. for suspending the sentence inflicted upon the applicant-appellant pursuant to the Judgment dated 24.01.2024 and sentence order dated 30.01.2024, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Cachar, Silchar in Sessions Case No.103/2016, convicting the applicant-appellant under Section 302 of IPC.
3. On a perusal of the evidence, it appears that there are eye witnesses to the incident implicating the applicant-appellant.
4. The learned counsel for the applicant-appellant submits that in view of the paper book having been furnished to him and to the learned Addl. P.P., the matter can be listed for hearing and he would not like to press this application under Section 389(2) of Cr.P.C.
5. On account of the submission made by the learned counsel for the applicant-appellant, the I.A. stands dismissed as not pressed.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant