Gauhati High Court
Crl.Pet./730/2022 of RAJU SIL Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR. on 25 February 2026
GAHC010147902022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Pet./730/2022 RAJU SIL S/O- LATE NONIGOPAL SIL, R/O- VIVEKANANDA ROAD, NEAR VIDYA MANDIR LP SCHOOL, BHAKRAVITA, P.S. AND DIST. BONGAIGAON, ASSAM, PIN- 788007. VERSUS THE STATE OF
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010147902022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Crl.Pet./730/2022
RAJU SIL
S/O- LATE NONIGOPAL SIL, R/O- VIVEKANANDA ROAD, NEAR VIDYA
MANDIR LP SCHOOL, BHAKRAVITA, P.S. AND DIST. BONGAIGAON, ASSAM, PIN- 788007.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR.
REPRESENTED BY THE P.P., ASSAM
2:SMTI. KAKOLI SEAL
W/O- SRI RADHIKA RANJAN SEAL
R/O- FLAT NO. 103-D
NIHAR APARTMENT
MALIGAON
GUWAHATI-781012
P..S JALUKBARI
DIST. KAMRUP(M)
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S M ABDULLAH P, MR. S MUNIR,MR. S RAHMAN,MD R
ISLAM
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, G UDDIN (r-2),MR A K AZAD (r-2)
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
26.02.2026 Heard Ms F Hussain, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr B
Page No.# 2/2 Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam, and Mr G Uddin, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 2
2. After some hearing in the matter, Ms F Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed that she may be allowed to withdraw the matter at this stage, with a liberty to approach again at the appropriate stage, if any grievance remains.
3. Accordingly, this criminal petition is closed on withdrawal, allowing the liberty to the petitioner to approach again, in case, a grievance arises.
4. Interim orders passed earlier stand merged with the final order.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant