Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Crl.)/187/2026 of SAHADEB CHAKMA @ MASTER Vs THE CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION on 24 February 2026
GAHC010035932026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/187/2026 SAHADEB CHAKMA @ MASTER SON OF BRIJMOHAN CHAKMA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- GIZACHERRA, P.S- LONGTHARAI VALLEY, DISTRICT- DHALAI, TRIPURA 799275. VERSUS THE CENTRAL
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010035932026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/187/2026
SAHADEB CHAKMA @ MASTER
SON OF BRIJMOHAN CHAKMA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- GIZACHERRA, P.S- LONGTHARAI VALLEY, DISTRICT- DHALAI, TRIPURA 799275.
VERSUS
THE CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
REPRESENTED BY THE STANDING COUNSEL, CENTRAL BUREAU OF
INVESTIGATION.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A ATREYA, MR. J KONWAR,MS. C KALITA
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, CBI,
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
25.02.2026 (M. Zothankhuma, J)
Mr. D.K. Bhattacharyya and Mr. J. Konwar, learned counsels for the applicant pray for condoning the delay of 3436 days in preferring the appeal against the conviction
and
sentence
of
the
appellant
under
Section
Page No.# 2/2 120B/364A/395/397/201/34 IPC by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No.1, Kamrup(M), Assam, in Sessions Case No.227(K)/2006.
2. The applicant’s counsels submit that altogether 9 (nine) persons have been convicted by the impugned judgment and 4 (four) appeals have been filed against the said judgment. While all the appeals have been disposed of, two of the convicted persons have been acquitted of the charges framed against them.
3. On considering the reasons for the delay given by the applicant in paragraph-9 of the application, we find that sufficient cause for the delay has been made out. Accordingly, the delay of 3436 days is condoned.
4. Registry to register the connected appeal and list the same.
5. The I.A. is accordingly disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant