Gauhati High Court

AB/393/2026 of SHANTI SHARMA AND 2 ORS. Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 23 February 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010037242026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/393/2026 SHANTI SHARMA AND 2 ORS. SON OF GOPAL SHARMA PERMANENT RESIDENT OF - VILL- SAMAGURI, VTC- SAMAGURI NO. 3, BLOCK-1.2, P.O. SAMAGURI, SUB- DISTRICT- PHULONI, DIST. KARBI

GAHC010037242026

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : AB/393/2026

SHANTI SHARMA AND 2 ORS.

SON OF GOPAL SHARMA

PERMANENT RESIDENT OF-

VILL- SAMAGURI, VTC- SAMAGURI NO. 3, BLOCK-1.2, P.O. SAMAGURI, SUB- DISTRICT- PHULONI, DIST. KARBI ANGLONG, ASSAM, PIN-782482, PRESENT ADDRESS- VILL- PUB- BHALUKMARI,P.O. BHALUKMARI, P.S. LANAKA, DIST. HOJAI, ASSAM, PIN-782446.

2: BIJOYA ACHARJEE @ DASHAMI

W/O SHANTI SHARMA

PERMANENT RESIDENT OF-

VILL- SAMAGURI

VTC- SAMAGURI NO. 3

BLOCK-1.2

P.O. SAMAGURI

SUB- DISTRICT- PHULONI

DIST. KARBI ANGLONG

ASSAM

PIN-782482

PRESENT ADDRESS-

VILL- PUB- BHALUKMARI

P.O. BHALUKMARI

P.S. LANAKA

DIST. HOJAI

ASSAM

PIN-782446.

3: DILIP LASHKAR

R/O KATHIATOLI

NAGAON

ASSA

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM

REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. T N DAS, MS JUTISMITA DAS,MR KRISHNANGSHU B

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 24-02-2026 Heard Ms. J. Das, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. D.P. Goswami, learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State. This is an application filed under section 482 of BNSS praying for granting pre- arrest bail to the accused/petitioner namely, Shanti Sharma, Bijoya Acharjee @ Dashami and Dilip Lashkar, in connection with Dispur P.S Case No. 530/2025 u/s 109(1)/238/296/305(a)/329(4)/351(2)/69/78(2)/89 of BNS 2023. We have gone through the contents of the FIR and have also seen the order dated 27.08.2025 passed in B.A No.2585/2025. The allegation against the petitioner herein is that they had co-operated with the applicant in B.A No. 2585/2025 when the informant had been allegedly put to harassment by the applicant in B.A No. 2585/2025. On perusal of the FIR and also the order passed in B.A No. 2585/2025, this Court deem fit that the petitioners named above in connection with the aforesaid case are not required for custodial interrogation in the case. Accordingly, it is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioners, they shall be released on a bail bond of Rs. 15,000/- each with one surety to the like amount subject to the satisfaction of the arresting authority. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned I.O on or before 06.03.2026 to participate in the investigation process The anticipatory bail application stands disposed.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead