Gauhati High Court

W.P.(Crl.)/10/2025 of YEAKUB ALI SHEIKH Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS on 23 February 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010057602025 2026:GAU-AS:2829 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : W.P.(Crl.)/10/2025 YEAKUB ALI SHEIKH S/O- LT. ABDUL KAIYUM R/O- LG. ROAD,WNO- 14 P/S AND DISTRICT DHUBURI, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS REPRESENTED BY

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010057602025

2026:GAU-AS:2829

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : W.P.(Crl.)/10/2025

YEAKUB ALI SHEIKH

S/O- LT. ABDUL KAIYUM R/O- LG. ROAD,WNO- 14 P/S AND DISTRICT

DHUBURI, ASSAM.

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS

REPRESENTED BY COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY HOME

DEPARTMENT, GUWAHATI PIN - 781006

2:INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (ADMINISTRATIVE)

ULUBARI GUWAHATI PIN 781007

3:SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

DISTRICT BISWANATH ASSAM PIN 784176

4:OFFICER IN CHARGE OF BISWANATH POLICE STATION

DIST BISWANATH PIN 784176 ASSAM

5:DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER KAMRUP METRO

ASSAM PIN 78100

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR MINTU SAIKIA, MS R DUTTA,MR J FIRDAUS

Advocate for the Respondent : MS. R GOGOI, GA ASSAM (R 1 TO 4), SC, TRANSPORT

DEPARTMENT, ASSAM

Page No.# 2/2

BEFORE

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

24.02.2026 Heard Ms R Dutta, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr R B Goswami, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Ms M D Borah, learned Standing Counsel, Transport Department.

2. Today, an instruction dated 4th of February, 2026,has been placed before this Court to the effect that the Flag of “NOT TO BE TRANSACTED” with regard to the vehicle bearing Registration No. AS-01GC-8514, has been removed in the system Vahan Software on 30.08.2025 itself.

3. In that view of the matter, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that if such tag has been removed, the grievance raised in this writ petition may be taken to have been redressed.

4. Accordingly, this petition is closed since the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed by the respondent authorities themselves.

5. The instructions are kept on record and marked with the letter-‘X’. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead