Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./419/2026 of RAJENDRA NAIK ALIAS RAJENDER Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 22 February 2026
GAHC010024362026 2026:GAU-AS:2808 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./419/2026 RAJENDRA NAIK ALIAS RAJENDER S/O LATE BHAGARAM NAIK, R/O SEUJNAGAR, BEHARBARI, BYELANE NO. 5, GANESH MANDIR PATH, P.O. BASISTHA, P.S. BASISTHA,
GAHC010024362026
2026:GAU-AS:2808
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./419/2026
RAJENDRA NAIK ALIAS RAJENDER
S/O LATE BHAGARAM NAIK, R/O SEUJNAGAR, BEHARBARI, BYELANE
NO. 5, GANESH MANDIR PATH, P.O. BASISTHA, P.S. BASISTHA, DIST.
KAMRUP (M), ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R CHETRI, S DAS,MR. M S BAISHYA
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 23.02.2026 Heard Mr. R. Chetri, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam.
2. This is an application under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 for granting bail to the accused/ petitioner, namely, Rajendra Naik @ Rajendra, who has been arrested on 01.01.2026, in connection with Basistha Police Station Case No. 621/2025 under Section 305(a) of BNS, 2023.
3. The learned Addl. P.P informed about the contents of the CD and the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that it is 53 days behind bars for the petitioner, even though the allegations are that he had arranged for a vehicle involved in the accident. The CD reflects that the some amount the stolen items have been recovered from other accused.
4. In the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner can be allowed to the privilege of bail, considering the length of detention and his alleged role.
5. Accordingly, the petitioner shall be released on bail, if not wanted in connection with any other case, on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand Only), with a two sureties of like amount subject to the satisfaction of the learned jurisdictional Court. The petitioner shall also abide by the following conditions;
(i) He will not leave the jurisdiction of the I.O. or the jurisdictional Court without prior written permission.
(ii) The petitioner shall not hamper or tamper with the evidence of the instant case in any manner.
(iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer.
(iv) The petitioner shall appear before the learned jurisdictional Court and the I.O as and when required and directed to do so.
(v) The learned jurisdictional Court, shall be at liberty to impose such other condition or conditions as may be deemed necessary to ensure the participation of the petitioner in the trial.
(vi) The petitioner shall not engage in any illegal activity of similar nature in the future.
(vii) The prosecuting authority shall be at liberty to bring any violation of the conditions imposed upon the notice of the competent court and request for a recall/cancellation of bail. The bail application is stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant