Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/787/2026 of SMT CHANDA CHAKRABORTY AND 14 ORS Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR on 19 February 2026
GAHC010282852025 2026:GAU-AS:2583 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/787/2026 SMT CHANDA CHAKRABORTY AND 14 ORS W/O NIKHIL CHAKRABORTY, R/O THANA ROAD, KARIMGANJ, PIN 788710, DIST. SRIBHUMI, ASSAM. 2: SMT. SEBIKA KANOO W/O AJOY
GAHC010282852025
2026:GAU-AS:2583
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/787/2026
SMT CHANDA CHAKRABORTY AND 14 ORS
W/O NIKHIL CHAKRABORTY, R/O THANA ROAD, KARIMGANJ, PIN 788710, DIST. SRIBHUMI, ASSAM.
2: SMT. SEBIKA KANOO
W/O AJOY KR. KANOO
R/O VILL. CHARGOLA T.E.
P.O. LILA CHEELA
PIN 788734
DIST. SRIBHUMI
ASSAM.
3: SAYARUN NESSA KHANAM
D/O MUFIZ ALI KHAN
R/O VILL TAKIPUR
P.O. KAYASTHA GRAM
PIN 788719
DIST. SRIBHUMI
ASSAM.
4: SMTI MADHURI KAR
W/O SRI SUJOY KAR
R/O VILL. KARNAMADHU
P.O. KARNAMADHU
PIN 788712
DIST. SRIBHUMI
ASSAM.
5: SAHANARA BEGUM
W/O FOGLUR RAHMAN
R/O VILL. BUNDASIL
P.O. BADARPUR
PIN 788806
DIST. SRIBHUMI
ASSAM.
6: SMT. JHUMA DAS
W/O DEBOBRATA DAS
R/O LAXMI BAZAR
WARD NO 6
BK 1
PIN 788710
DIST. SRIBHUMI
ASSAM.
7: MONWARA BEGUM
W/O MD. ABDUL HAQUE TALUKDAR
R/O VILL. EAST TONGIBARI
P.O RATABARI
P.S. RATABARI
PIN 788735
DIST. SRIBHUMI
ASSAM.
8: SMT UMA DAS
W/O SRI NANDAN KUMAR DAS
R/O VILL. GHORAMARA
P.O. CHAITANYA NAGAR
P.S. BADARPUR
PIN 788720
DIST. SRIBHUMI
ASSAM.
9: SUREHA BEGUM
W/O SALIK AHMED KHAN
R/O VILL KANAKALASH
PO. BHANGA BAZAR
P.S. BADARPUR
DIST. SRIBHUMI
ASSAM.
10: SMTI UJJALA DEY
D/O BRAJENDRA DEY
R/O VILL. SINGIMARI
P.O. SINGIMARI
PIN 782125
DIST .NAGAON
ASSAM.
11: SMT. TRISHNA CHAKRABORTY
W/O PRASANNA MUKHARJEE
R/O WARD NO. 2
M.C. ROAD
P.O. BIJNI
PIN 783390
DIST. CHIRANG
ASSAM.
12: RUNIA KHANDAKAR
W/O MD. SHAHJAHAN ALI
R/O VILL. GORAMARI
P.O. GOREMAR
P.S. BARPETA PIN 781314
DIST. BARPETA
ASSAM.
13: RUBIA KHATUN
D/O AZAHAR ALI
R/O KALGACHIA
P.O. AND P.S. KALGACHIA
PIN 781319
DIST. BARPETA
ASSAM.
14: SMT. SUFIA KHATUN
W/O ABDUL KALAM AZAD
R/O VILL. SUKMANAH
P.O. SUKMANAH
PIN 781316
DIST. BARPETA
ASSAM.
15: SMT. DIPTI REKHA DAS
W/O KAMAL LOCHAN PATOWARY
R/O VILL. SUNDARIDIA
P.O. SUNDARIDIA
PIN 781314
DIST. BARPETA
ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF
ASSAM, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPTT., DISPUR, GUWAHATI 6, KAMRUP (M), ASSAM.
2:THE DIRECTOR OF SOCIAL WELFARE
ASSAM
GUWAHATI 781 KAMRUP M
ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S BORTHAKUR, MR. D GOGOI
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 20.02.2026 Heard Mr. S. Borthakur, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. D. Bora, learned Government Advocate appearing for the State respondent.
2. By filing the instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners are seeking past retrospective benefits with effect from 06.02.2016 as Supervisor of the Social Welfare Department, Assam.
3. The case of the petitioners is that the petitioners were initially appointed as Supervisors on 06.02.2016 and subsequently, they have been regularized, however, benefits of regular appointments were not given to them from the initial date of their appointment.
4. It is submitted at the bar that similar issues have already been decided by this Court in WP(C) No. 7215/2018 and WP(C) No. 6798/2024 by judgment & order dated 20.06.2022 and 16.06.2025 respectively. The relevant portion of the judgment & order dated 20.06.2022 in WP(C) No. 7215/2018 reads as under: “19. As would appear from the affidavit-in-opposition that finally vide orders dated 16.08.2021 (or of nearby dates) the petitioners have been given the benefit of a regular appointment, this Court is of the opinion that such benefits are to be given retrospective effect from the date of their initial appointment made on 06.02.2016. Such retrospective effect would also include the balance of the monthly salaries which is to be calculated in terms of scale which the petitioners would have been otherwise paid and the arrears be released to them accordingly. All other benefits including fitment in the appropriate scale of pay, seniority etc. are also directed to be given to the petitioners. The aforesaid direction is given in view of the fact that there is no dispute with regard to the nature of the service discharged by the petitioners as Supervisors and are part of the same cadre of Supervisors which also includes regular appointee in the rest 75 % of the vacancies.
20. The writ petition accordingly stands allowed. The directions contained in the preceding paragraphs are to be complied with within a period of 60 days from today.”
5. Mr. D. Bora, learned Government Advocate appearing for the State respondent upon instructions from the office of the Director of Women and Child Development, Assam vide communication dated 19.02.2026, submits that the direction passed by this Court in WP(C) No. 7215/2018 and WP(C) No. 6798/2024 is squarely applicable to the context of the present case.
6. Considering that this Court has already granted such benefit with retrospective effect, which the learned counsel for the respondent fairly submits that such benefit also be extended to the petitioners, this Court, in the interest of justice, deems it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition by directing that since the petitioners have been given the benefit of regular appointment, such benefits are to be given retrospective effect from the date of their initial appointment made on 06.02.2016. Such retrospective effect would also include the balance of the monthly salaries, which is to be calculated in terms of the scale which the petitioners would have been otherwise paid and the arrears would be released to them accordingly. All other benefits including fitment in the appropriate scale of pay, seniority etc., are also directed to be given to the petitioners. Ordered accordingly.
7. The aforesaid directions are given in view of the fact that there is no dispute with regard to the nature of service discharged by the petitioners as supervisors and are part of the same cadre of supervisors, which also includes regular appointees in the rest 75% of the vacancies.
8. Accordingly, the writ petition stands allowed and disposed of.
9. The directions contained in the preceding paragraphs are to be complied within a period of 60 (sixty) days from today.
10. No order as to cost.
11. A copy of the communication dated 19.02.2026 is kept on record and marked as “X”. JUDGE Comparing Assistant