Gauhati High Court
AB/102/2026 of MRS DUSMITA BARUAH Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 18 February 2026
GAHC010007612026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/102/2026 MRS DUSMITA BARUAH DAUGHTER OF LATE BIREN BARUAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHABOTI PO CHABORI PS NORTH LAKHIMPUR DISTRICT LAKHIMPUR ASSAM 787001 VERSUS THE STATE OF
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010007612026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/102/2026
MRS DUSMITA BARUAH
DAUGHTER OF LATE BIREN BARUAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHABOTI
PO CHABORI PS NORTH LAKHIMPUR DISTRICT LAKHIMPUR ASSAM
787001
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REP BY PP ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR G Z AHMED, MR S A REEYAZ
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
19.02.2026
Heard Mr. G Z Ahmed, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K. Baishya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam. By this application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 the petitioner, namely, Mrs. Dusmita Baruah, has prayed for pre-arrest bail, who apprehends arrest in connection with Lakhimpur P.S. Case No.
Page No.# 2/2 11/2026. Perused the Case Diary, so received. Considering the allegations brought against the petitioner and since the petitioner has appeared before the Investigating Officer pursuant to the interim protection granted to her by this Court vide order dated 21.01.2026 and also the fact that the petitioner is a government servant as well as she has been participated in the investigation, this Court is of the opinion that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not necessary. Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail made by the petitioner is allowed. Accordingly, the interim order dated 21.01.2026 is made absolute, subject to condition that the petitioner shall continue to appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required, failing which the Investigating Authority will be at liberty to pray before this Court for cancellation of the bail granted to the petitioner. The bail application is disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant