Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/407/2026 of PAPORI BARUAH Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS on 18 February 2026
GAHC010213342025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/407/2026 PAPORI BARUAH D/O- PELON BARUAH VILL-DULIA GAON P.O- DHAKUAKHANA DIST- LAKHIMPUR ASSAM 2: PRANAB KUMAR LAMU BORUAH S/O- KUSUM KUMAR BORUAH VILL- NABA
GAHC010213342025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/407/2026
PAPORI BARUAH
D/O- PELON BARUAH
VILL-DULIA GAON
P.O- DHAKUAKHANA
DIST- LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM
2: PRANAB KUMAR LAMU BORUAH
S/O- KUSUM KUMAR BORUAH
VILL- NABA CHAWREKIA
P.O- OGURI DANGDHARA
DIST- LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM
PIN-787055
3: BHABEN BARUAH
S/O- ATULCHANDRA BORUAH
VILL- LAKHIPUR
P.O- OGURI DANGDHARA
DIST- LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM
PIN-787055
4: PARESH BORAH
S/O- DEBESWAR BORUAH
VILL- KRISHNAPUR
P.O- OGURI DANGDHARA
DIST- LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM
PIN-787055
5: POMPI RANI PEGU
D/O- KIRAN CHANDRA PEGU
VILL- KORDOIGURI
P.O- BAHPORA
P.S- DHAKUAKHANA
DIST- LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM
PIN-787055
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS
REP. BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
2:COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM
EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
3:SECRETARY
TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM
ELEMENTARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
4:DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION
GOVT. OF ASSAM
KAHILIPARA
GUWAHATI-19
5:DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
LAKHIMPUR
6:DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER
LAKHIMPUR
7:DEPUTY INSPECTOR OF SCHOOL
DHAKUAKHANA
8:BLOCK ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER
DHAKUAKHANA
------------
Advocate for : MR. U P CHALIHA
Advocate for : GA
ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 19.02.2026 Heard Mr. D. P. Chaliha, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. M. Roy, learned counsel appearing for the applicant. Also heard Mr. B. Talukdar, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Elementary Education. By the instant application, the applicant is seeking modification/ correction/ rectification/ alteration of typographical error, which has inadvertently appeared in the paragraph Nos. 3, 4 and 5 of the writ petition, i.e., WP(C) No. 5558/2025. It is stated that the statements in paragraph Nos. 3, 4 and 5 should be corrected as:
a) Paragraph 3 “that the petitioner been paid her salary up to 01.03.2003.”
b) Paragraph 4 “that the petitioner been paid his salary up to 02.04.2002.”
c) Paragraph 5 “that the petitioner been paid his salary up to 06.04.2002.” Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the averments made in the interlocutory application, it appears that certain errors has been crept into the paragraph Nos. 3, 4 and 5 of the writ petition, which requires correction in the interest of justice.
Accordingly, the interlocutory application stands allowed. Let an amended writ petition be submitted before the Registry for doing the needful within a week. JUDGE Comparing Assistant