Armed Forces Tribunal

Ex JWO Prabhu Ram Kumar vs UOI & Others on 9 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, JAIPUR

CIRCUIT BENCH, JODHPUR

(THROUGH VIRTUAL HEARING)

3.

OA No 165/2024

Ex JWO Prabhu Ram Kumhar, S/o Shri Pukharam ji, Resident of House No 5, MES Power House, Shiv Shakti Nagar, Air Force, Ratanada, Jodhpur, Rajasthan

…. Applicant

Versus

1.

UOI, through the Secretary, Ministry of Defence, New Delhi –

110 011

2.

The PCDA(P), Draupadi Ghat, Prayagraj, UP

3.

The Centralised Pension Process Centre, State Bank of India, IInd Floor, Chandni Chowk, New Delhi-110 006

4.

The Senior Accounts Officer, CDA (AF), Subroto Park, New Delhi – 110 010

5.

The AGM/BM, State Bank of India, Ratanada Branch, Indian Air Force Branch, Jodhpur – 342 011

…. Respondents

For Applicant

: Mr DS Rathore, Proxy for

Mr BL Swami, Advocate

For Respondents

: Mr. Yuvraj Singh, Advocate (R 1,2 & 4)

None for Respondents No 3 & 5

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVERDHAN BARDHAR, MEMBER (J)

HON’BLE MR. SANJIV MITTAL, MEMBER (A)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

09.12.2025

1. We have heard the counsels for the parties and perused the material placed on record.

2. Perusal of record reveals that despite Notice having been served upon the Respondents PDA 3 & 5 issued in pursuance of Order of this Tribunal dated

2

27/8/2025, none appears on their behalf, today. The applicant herein has filed this OA praying for directing the Non applicants to refund the impugned recovery effected to the tune of Rs 105,081/- (Rupees One Lac Five Thousand and Eight One only) with the consequential relief. He has also prayed for directing the Non Applicants to pay interest @6% pa on the amount of Rs 105,081/- till the date of actual payment/refund alongwith payment of costs of this application.

3. The Respdondents No 1,2 & 4 has filed their Reply Statement and submitted that the office of Joint (CDA) Air Force has not proposed any recovery and so far as recovery on account of overpayment of pension is concerned, the matter pertains toPDA/CPPC, ie, the Respondent No 3 and, hence, prayed for discharging/dispensing the Respondents No 1,2 & 4 from the memo of parties in this matter.

4. The recovery of Rs 8700/- on account of purported excess pension paid to the applicant to the tune of Rs 105,181/- has initiated with effect from 2017 based on the letter dated 31/5/2017 of the State Bank of India, CPPC, Chandni Chowk, Delhi, addressed to the AGM/BM, State Bank of India, Indian Air Force Branch, Jodhpur. In view of this fact, it is ordered that no further recovery shall be effected from the pension account of the applicant without prior notice and/or seeking response from the Applicant after issuing a Notice by the PDA.

5. The OA is disposed off accordingly. No order on costs.

(SANJIV MITTAL)

(GOVERDHAN BARDHAR) MEMBER (A)

MEMBER (J)

cda/-

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead