Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./256/2026 of RAMESH ALIAS ROMESH BASUMATARY Vs STATE OF ASSAM on 17 February 2026
GAHC010015372026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./256/2026 RAMESH ALIAS ROMESH BASUMATARY S/O SRI NOREN BASUMATARY, R/O MILANPUR, PS GOHPUR, DIST BISWANATH, ASSAM VERSUS STATE OF ASSAM TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010015372026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./256/2026
RAMESH ALIAS ROMESH BASUMATARY
S/O SRI NOREN BASUMATARY, R/O MILANPUR, PS GOHPUR, DIST
BISWANATH, ASSAM
VERSUS
STATE OF ASSAM
TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A W AMAN, MD A RAHMAN,MS SURAYA
RAHMAN,SAMIM RAHMAN,MR SARFRAZ NAWAZ,MR. SURAJIT DAS
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
18.02.2026
Heard Mr. Sarfraz Nawaz, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Mr. B. Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam representing State. By this application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 the petitioner, namely, Ramesh @ Romesh Basumatary, who is in custody in connection with Sonari P.S. Case No. 116/2025, has prayed Page No.# 2/2 for release on bail. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has produced the Case Diary. I have gone through the materials available on record and it appears that the investigation is still going on. Having heard the learned counsel for both sides and considering entire aspect of the matter, this court is of the view that the petitioner does not deserve to be released on bail, at this stage. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. The bail application is disposed of. Case Diary shall be returned.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant