Gauhati High Court
AB/1622/2025 of ABDUL KHALEQUE AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 17 February 2026
GAHC010153092025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1622/2025 ABDUL KHALEQUE AND ANR S/O LATE AZIMUDDIN VILL- SHIMLAJHAR P.S. GOBARDHANA DIST. BAKSA, ASSAM 2: FEDDUS ALI AHMED S/O LATE AZIMUDDIN VILL- SHIMLAJHAR P.S.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010153092025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/1622/2025
ABDUL KHALEQUE AND ANR
S/O LATE AZIMUDDIN
VILL- SHIMLAJHAR
P.S. GOBARDHANA
DIST. BAKSA, ASSAM
2: FEDDUS ALI AHMED
S/O LATE AZIMUDDIN
VILL- SHIMLAJHAR
P.S. GOBARDHANA
DIST. BAKSA
ASSA
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REP BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R ALI, MISS. S PARBIN,MR H A AHMED
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
18.02.2026
Heard Mr. R. Ali, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. B. Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam. By this application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, the petitioners, namely, (1) Abdul Khaleque and (2) Feddus Ali Ahmed, who apprehend arrest in connection with Garchuk P.S. Case No. 194/2025, have prayed for pre-arrest bail. By producing the Case Diary, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that pursuant to the interim order dated 17.07.2025 passed by this Court, the petitioners have appeared before the Investigating Officer and their statements have also been recorded. Having heard the learned counsel for both the sides, this court is of the opinion that, as the petitioners have been appeared before the Investigating Officer and cooperating with the investigation, the custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not necessary. Hence, the prayer for pre-arrest bail of the petitioners is allowed. Accordingly, the interim order dated 17.07.2025 passed by this Court is made absolute. The bail application is disposed of. Case Diary shall be returned. JUDGE Comparing Assistant