Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./194/2026 of BIKI KURMI Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR on 16 February 2026
GAHC010009222026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./194/2026 BIKI KURMI S/O LT MONI RAM KURMI,R/O MORAN, KHUMTAI PATHAR LINE, PS MORANHAT, DIST SIVASAGAR, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010009222026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./194/2026
BIKI KURMI
S/O LT MONI RAM KURMI,R/O MORAN, KHUMTAI PATHAR LINE, PS
MORANHAT, DIST SIVASAGAR, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
2:KHUSBU KURMI
W/O BIKI KURMI
R/O MORAN
KHUMTAI PATHAR LINE
PS MORANHAT
DIST CHARAIDEO
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR D MEDHI, S YESMIN
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MR P BHATTACHARJYA(R2)
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date :17.02.2026 Mr. D. Medhi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D.P. Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent.
Page No.# 2/2
2. Mr. P. Bhattacharjee, has appeared for the respondent No.2 on receipt of notice.
3. We have gone through the records annexed with the bail petition. We also heard the learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.2, who has submitted that would be no objection from the mother of the alleged victim, if the father of the victim is allowed to go on bail.
4. We have also seen the statements during the trial which is presently underway.
5. In the facts and circumstances, we deem it fit to allow the release of the petitioner on bail, subject to his furnishing a bond of Rs.10, 000/- with two sureties for like amount, at least one who should have immovable property, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, subject to the conditions:
i) The petitioner shall not leave the territorial jurisdiction of the learned Trial Court without prior written permission;
ii) The petitioner shall not hamper and tamper with the evidence of the case;
iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer.
iv) The petitioner shall not try to contact or influence the victim or the mother in any manner, whatsoever, till conclusion of the trial.
v) The petitioner shall appear before the learned Trial Court as and when directed to do so;
vi) The Learned Trial Court shall be at liberty to impose such other condition or conditions as may be deemed necessary to ensure the participation of the petitioner in the trial.
vii) The prosecuting authority shall be at liberty to bring any violation of the conditions imposed to the notice of the competent court and request for a recall/cancellation of bail.
6. Bail application is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant