Gauhati High Court

Bail Appln./251/2026 of SIRAJUL ISLAM Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 15 February 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010013392026 2026:GAU-AS:2259 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./251/2026 SIRAJUL ISLAM SON OF - KASIM ALI, VILL - CHARAIBAL MUSLIM GAON, RAWRIAH, POLICE STATION - JORHAT, DISTRICT - JORHAT, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010013392026

2026:GAU-AS:2259

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : Bail Appln./251/2026

SIRAJUL ISLAM

SON OF- KASIM ALI,

VILL - CHARAIBAL MUSLIM GAON, RAWRIAH, POLICE STATION - JORHAT, DISTRICT - JORHAT, ASSAM

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM

REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. V A CHOWDHURY, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 16.02.2026 Heard Mr. V.A. Choudhury, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. This bail application had been preferred under Section 483 of the BNSS in connection with Jorhat PS Case No. 616 of 2025 registered under Section 316(2)/ 318(4)/ 303(2)/ 317(2)/ 317(4)/ 112 of B.N.S., 2023 read with Section 25(1)(a) Arms Act, 1959 and Section 27-A N.D.P.S. Act, 1985.

Page No.# 2/2 TCR had been called for along with the case diary. TCR is received. The petitioner had been arrested in connection the aforementioned case on 23.12.2025, although the PS Case had been registered on 05.12.2025. Having given due consideration, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner can be granted the privilege of bail in connection with Jorhat PS Case No. 616 of 2025, during the period of trial on the following conditions namely:

1. The petitioner shall submit bond of Rs. 30,000/- with two sureties of the like amount one of whom shall have immovable in his name to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.

2. The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the learned trial Court without the permission.

3. The petitioner shall appear before the learned trial Court on each of the dates fixed by the learned Trial Court for appearance.

4. The petitioner shall not influence any of the witnesses from giving true statements before the learned trial Court during the trial.

5. That the petitioner shall not be involved in any crime in the future.

6. That the petitioner shall abide by any other condition that may be imposed by the learned Trial Court during the period of trial.

7. Bail application disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead