Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/3171/2023 of SANJAY AGARWAL Vs NIVEDITA AGARWAL on 10 February 2026
GAHC010023422026 2026:GAU-AS:1870 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3171/2023 SANJAY AGARWAL S/O- SRI ASHOK AGARWAL R/O- N.S.C.B. ROAD HOJAI DIST. HOJAI ASSAM PIN- 782435. VERSUS NIVEDITA AGARWAL W/O- SRI SANJAY AGARWAL
GAHC010023422026
2026:GAU-AS:1870
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3171/2023
SANJAY AGARWAL
S/O- SRI ASHOK AGARWAL
R/O- N.S.C.B. ROAD
HOJAI
DIST. HOJAI
ASSAM
PIN- 782435.
VERSUS
NIVEDITA AGARWAL
W/O- SRI SANJAY AGARWAL (ISWARWALIA) (NEWLY MARRIED HUSBAND)
R/O- HANUMAN BHAWAN
FLAT NO. 32
THIRD FLOOR
MARWARI PATTY
A.T. ROAD
P.S. AND DIST. DIBRUGARH
ASSAM
PRESENTLY RESIDING AT SECTOR-1
MANIK CH. DAS PATH
CHALIHA NAGAR
P.O. AND DIST. TINSUKIA
ASSAM
------------
Advocate for : MR. R L YADAV
Advocate for : MR. N HASAN appearing for NIVEDITA AGARWAL
Linked Case :
SANJAY AGARWAL
VERSUS
NIVEDITA AGARWAL
------------
Advocate for : MR. R L YADAV
Advocate for : appearing for NIVEDITA AGARWAL
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 11-02-2026 Heard Ms. M. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel appearing for the applicant.
2. It is submitted that the parties have amicably entered into a settlement of their disputes and accordingly, joint petition has been filed before the Court of learned Addl. District Judge, Dibrugarh, wherein the learned Addl. District Judge, Dibrugarh by Judgment and Decree dated 25.03.2025 disposed of Title Suit No.(D) 30/2022.
3. Ms. M. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that she has instructions not to press the instant I.A. filed for condoning the delay occurred in filing the connected Civil Revision petition.
4. In view of the compromise arrived between the parties and in view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the applicant, the I.A. stands dismissed on being withdrawn.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant