Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/3219/2023 of SAMELA BASUMATARY Vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS on 9 February 2026
GAHC010120182023 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3219/2023 SAMELA BASUMATARY D/O- LATE MUGARAM NARZARY, W/O- LATE KARENDRA BASUMATARY, R/O- VILL.- ANTHAIBARI DEBORGAON, P.O. AND P.S. SERFANGURI, DIST. KOKRAJHAR,
GAHC010120182023
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/3219/2023
SAMELA BASUMATARY
D/O- LATE MUGARAM NARZARY, W/O- LATE KARENDRA BASUMATARY, R/O- VILL.- ANTHAIBARI DEBORGAON, P.O. AND P.S. SERFANGURI, DIST.
KOKRAJHAR, BTR, ASSAM, PIN- 783346.
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI-01.
2:THE SECRETARY
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
GOVT. OF INDIA
NEW DELHI-01.
3:THE CENTRAL PENSION ACCOUNTING OFFICER
MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF EXPENDITURE
TRIKOOT-II
BHIKAJI CAMA PLACE
NEW DELHI-110066.
4:THE AOC
RECORDS
PIN- 900453 (ARMY) C/O 56
APO.
5:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
KOKRAJHAR
(ZILA SAINIK WELFARE OFFICE) KOKRAJHAR
PIN- 783370.
6:THE COMMANDING OFFICER
C/O 56 A.P. SECUNDERABAD
PIN- 900453.
7:THE BRANCH MANAGER
SBI
KOKRAJHAR
COURTPARA
PIN- 783370
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M U MONDAL, MD. I H KHAN, MR K ISLAM,MR A ALIM SK
Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., MR. S P CHOUDHURY,GA, ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 10-02-2026 Heard Mr. M.U Mondal, learned counsel for the petitioner and also heard Mr. P.K Borah, learned Standing counsel for the Elementary Education department/respondent No.5. The matter had been referred to Special Mediation Drive by an order dated 05.08.2025. The Mediation report dated 05.01.2026 has been placed before this Court. The report states that the matter has been amicably settled between the contesting parties in certain terms and conditions. In view of the submissions made between the contesting parties, this writ petition does not need any further adjudication. The parties shall carry out the process of the settlement already arrived at and all shall co-operate to do so.
Writ petition is disposed of on settlement. JUDGE Comparing Assistant