Gauhati High Court

WP(C)/3721/2024 of SAHERA BIBI Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS on 9 February 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010146072024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3721/2024 SAHERA BIBI W/O- LATE JOYNAL ABEDIN @ JAYNAL ABEDIN, PERMANENT R/O VILLAGE- FAKIRANIRJHAR PART-I, P.O. BARKANDA, P.S. BILASIPARA, DIST.- DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN-

GAHC010146072024

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/3721/2024

SAHERA BIBI

W/O- LATE JOYNAL ABEDIN @ JAYNAL ABEDIN, PERMANENT R/O

VILLAGE- FAKIRANIRJHAR PART-I, P.O. BARKANDA, P.S. BILASIPARA, DIST.- DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN- 783348, PRESENTLY, RESIDING AT VILLAGE- CHALBANDA, P.O. BARKANDA, P.S. BILASIPARA, DIST.- DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN- 783348

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS

REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.

OF ASSAM, PENSION AND PUBLIC GRIEVANCE DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6

2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM

HEALTH DEPARTMENT

DISPUR

GUWAHATI-6

3:THE DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES

ASSAM

HENGRABARI

GUWAHATI-36

4:THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES

DHUBRI

DIST.- DHUBRI

ASSAM

PIN- 783301

5:THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL

ASSAM

MAIDAMGAON

BELTOLA

GUWAHATI-29

6:THE TREASURY OFFICER

BILASIPARA TREASURY

DIST.- DHUBRI

ASSAM

PIN- 783348

7:THE DIRECTOR OF PENSION

ASSAM

HOUSEFED COMPLEX

DISPUR

GUWAHATI- 06

8:SMTI SHIRIJAN BEGUM

W/O- LATE JOYNAL ABEDIN

R/O- VILLAGE FAKIRANIRJHAR PART-I

P.O. BARKANDA

P.S. BILASIPARA

DIST.- DHUBRI

ASSAM

PIN- 78334

A Advocate for the petitioner ; Mr. S. Alom Advocate for the respondents : Mr. M.H Talukdar, R/No. 8

Ms. D. Borah, R/No. 2, 3 & 4

Mr. B. Chakravorty, R/No. 5

Mr. A. Chaliha, R/No. 6

Date on which judgment is : NA

reserved.

Date of pronouncement of : 10.02.2026.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Judgment.

Whether the pronouncement : NA is of the operative part of the judgment?

Whether the full judgment : Yes has been pronounced?

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR JUDGMENT & ORDER (ORAL) Date : 10-02-2026 Heard Mr. S. Alom, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. M.H Talukdar, learned counsel for the respondent No. 8, Ms. D. Borah, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2, 3 & 4, Mr. B. Chakravorty, learned Standing counsel for the Accountant General/respondent No. 5 and Mr. A. Chaliha, learned counsel for the respondent No. 6.

2. The controversy in this writ petition was regarding the payment of the family pension of the petitioner and/or the respondent No.8 where both claimed to be the wives of the deceased Government employee.

3. The husband of the petitioner and the respondent No.8 had superannuated from service on 30.11.2015 and on 06.02.2023, the retired employee had met his demise when he was already drawing the pension.

4. On 11.09.2023, the petitioner submitted a representation before the respondent No. 6 i.e Treasury Officer Bilasipara for being afforded the family pension claimed by the wife of the deceased government employee. Thereafter, it had come to the knowledge of the petitioner that the respondent No.8 had also staked claim to family pension as second wife and therefore, the family pension papers could not be processed further. Since the family pension was neither paid to the petitioner nor the respondent No.8, the petitioner approached this Court.

5. During deliberation in the matter, on 29.01.2026, this Court observed that the learned counsel for the respondent No.8, on instructions, submitted that respondent

No. 8 has no objection if the petitioner was allowed to receive the family pension, subject to the petitioner assuring to part with 50% of the said amount in favour of the respondent No.8. This Court had required the petitioner to file an affidavit to parting with 50% of the family pension, if the same is paid to her.

6. Today, the affidavit filed by the petitioner is found on record. The respondent No.8 had already filed an affidavit stating no objection if the petitioner desired to part with 50% of the family pension in her favour.

7. In view of the above affidavit filed by the petitioner agreeing to part with 50% of the family pension, this Court deems fit to dispose of the writ petition by directing the respondent No.8 to deposit half of the pension payment order which was issued in favour of the deceased Government employee and which is stated to be in her possession, to the concerned Treasury Officer on or before 27.02.2026.

8. On receipt of the aforesaid documents from the respondent No. 8, the respondent No. 6 shall forward both halves of the PPO to the office of the respondent No. 3, who shall cause immediate steps to be taken for correction in the revised nomination on or before 23.03.2026.

9. After effectuating the revision/correction, the respondent no. 3 shall forward it to respondent No.5.

10. On receipt of the request for revised nomination, the respondent No. 5 shall immediately process the same and after making necessary correction forward it to the respondent No.6 i.e. Treasury Officer, Bilasipara Treasury Dhubri, who shall thereafter take necessary steps on or before 21.04.2026 to ensure that the petitioner starts receiving the pensionary benefits before the end of April, 2026 invariably.

11. The petitioner, who has given assurance before this Court by way of an affidavit, shall, on receipt of the pension into her account, immediately part with 50% of the family pension in favour of the respondent No.8 within a period of 10 days from the date of the pension being entered into the account of the petitioner, and shall continue to do so thereafter every month. The computation of the arrear of the pension receivable by the petitioner, to which the respondent No. 8 shall also be entitled to the extent of 50%, shall be done and paid within the month of May, 2026 along with regular family pension payable in the said month.

12. Each of the official respondents assigned roles in this order shall file an affidavit of compliance within 10(ten) days of completion of their role as respectively assigned to them by this order. In case the affidavits of respondent No. 3, 5 & 6 are filed on or before 15.06.2026, no further action would be required. However, if the affidavits are not filed as directed, the Registry would list this case again on 19.06.2026 with an office note.

13. Writ petition is disposed of.

14. No costs. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead