Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/963/2016 of LUTFUNNESSA BEGUM and 3 ORS. Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS on 8 February 2026
GAHC010008942016 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/963/2016 LUTFUNNESSA BEGUM and 3 ORS. D/O LT. MOHAMMED ALI, VILL. SRIGOURI, P.O. SRIGOURI-788806, DIST- KARIMGANJ, ASSAM 2: FAZLUR RAHMAN S/O LT. MAHMUD ALI VILL.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010008942016
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/963/2016
LUTFUNNESSA BEGUM and 3 ORS.
D/O LT. MOHAMMED ALI, VILL. SRIGOURI, P.O. SRIGOURI-788806, DIST- KARIMGANJ, ASSAM
2: FAZLUR RAHMAN
S/O LT. MAHMUD ALI
VILL. KAZIRGRAM
P.O. BHANGA BAZAR-788701
DIST- KARIMGANJ
ASSAM
3: EBADUR RAHMAN CHOUDHURY
S/O LT. MATASIN ALI
VILL. DEORAIL
P.O. BADARPUR-788806
DIST- KARIMGANJ
ASSAM
4: NAHARA BEGUM
D/O MD. ABDUL HAQUE
VILL. JAGADISHPUR
P.O. KATIGORAH
DIST- CACHAR
ASSA
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
REP. BY THE SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, EDUCATION ELE DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY-6
2:THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION
ASSAM
KAHILIPARA
Page No.# 2/2
GHY-19
3:THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER
KARIMGANJ DISTRICT
P.O. KARIMGANJ
PIN-788710
ASSAM
4:THE DY. INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS
KARIMGANJ DISTRICT
P.O. KARIMGANJ
PIN-788710
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. T U LASKAR, MS.N DEY,MS.S DASGUPTA,MR .B
MALAKAR,MR.N DHAR
Advocate for the Respondent : , SC, ELEMENTARY EDUCATION
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 09.02.2026 None appears for the petitioner on call. The matter has been listed in the column for referring to the Special Mediation Drive. The matter is of the year 2016, the claim of the petitioner is for payment of arrear salary. Since none has appeared on two occasions, the matter stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant