Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/286/2026 of DEBAJIT KALITA Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHERS on 8 February 2026
GAHC010257942025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Linked Case : I.A.(Civil)/286/2026 DEBAJIT KALITA S/O ANANTA KALITA R/O VILL- 2 NO. RONGABANANI P.S. TINGKHONG DIST. DIBRUGARH ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHERS TO BE
GAHC010257942025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Linked Case : I.A.(Civil)/286/2026
DEBAJIT KALITA
S/O ANANTA KALITA R/O VILL- 2 NO. RONGABANANI P.S. TINGKHONG
DIST. DIBRUGARH
ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHERS
TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM
DEPARTMENT OF HOME
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6
2:THE STATE POLICE ACCOUNTABILITY COMMISSIONER
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
ULUBARI
GUWAHATI-7.
3:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
ULUBARI
GUWAHATI-7.
4:THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (WR)
ASSAM
BONGAIGAON.
5:THE SR. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
DHUBRI
P.O.AND DIST. DHUBRI
ASSAM
6:THE SR. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
SIVASAGAR
P.O. AND DIST. SIVSAGAR
ASSAM
------------
Advocate for : MR. P K ROYCHOUDHURY
Advocate for : GA
ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHERS
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 09-02-2026 Heard Mr. P.K Roychoudhury, learned counsel for the applicant. By the order dated 05.12.2025 it was directed that till the next date fixed i.e. 12.11.2025 proceeding against the petitioner should not be carried out in terms of the show cause notice issued to him. On the failure of the petitioner to take appropriate steps for service of notice, this Court on 31.01.2026 had observed that if steps were not taken prior to 09.02.2026 it would be presumed that the petitioner is not interested in the instant proceeding. Liberty was however granted to renew the prayer for interim protection on the next date i.e. today, in case the steps were taken. Mr. P.K Roychoudhury, learned counsel has submitted that he has taken steps and therefore, this Court may extend the interim order passed on 05.12.2025. In view of the steps taken, this I.A(C) is disposed of by extending the interim protection granted to the petitioner by the order dated 05.12.2025 till the next date of listing of the writ petition.
I.A(C) accordingly disposed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant