Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/231/2026 of KHANDAKAR ABUL HUSSAIN Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 8 February 2026
GAHC010006792026 2026:GAU-AS:1735 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/231/2026 KHANDAKAR ABUL HUSSAIN SON OF KH ANOWAR ALI,RESIDENT OF P.O. GUGUBARI, DISTRICT BARPETA, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL
GAHC010006792026
2026:GAU-AS:1735
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/231/2026
KHANDAKAR ABUL HUSSAIN
SON OF KH ANOWAR ALI,RESIDENT OF P.O. GUGUBARI, DISTRICT
BARPETA, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM
PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI 6
2:THE COMMISSIONER
PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI 6
3:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI 6
4:JOINT DIRECTOR
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER PANCHAYAT AND RURAL
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI 6
5:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
BARPETA ZILLA PARISHAD
P.O. BARPETA
DISTRICT BARPETA
ASSAM
6:THE PROJECT DIRECTOR
DISTRICT RURAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY BARPETA
DISTRICT BARPETA
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S DAS, MR. T DEWAN
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, P AND R.D.,SC, FINANCE
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 09-02-2026 Heard Mr. B. Singha, learned counsel for the applicant and also heard Mr. A. Roy, learned Standing counsel for the respondents. Mr. B. Singha, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that in WP(C) No. 3561/2018, the name of the applicant had appeared as “KH Abdul Hussain” which should be actually recorded as “Khandakar Abul Hussain”. Mr. A. Roy, learned Standing counsel for the P&RD department has submitted that the correction in the order of the disposed writ petition perhaps the same may be not carried out and it ought to be left upon the applicant to do the necessities with adequate proof to the respondents to show that the applicant is the same person. I.A(C) is supported by an affidavit. At the request of Mr. B. Singha, learned counsel for the applicant, this
Court disposed of the application allowing the applicant to appear before the respondents authorities for grant of relief already granted in the writ petition by taking the correct name of the applicant on record and doing needful. I.A(C) stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant