Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/2211/2023 of MS. REJINA DEKARAJA BORDOLOI Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS on 5 February 2026
GAHC010081682023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2211/2023 MS. REJINA DEKARAJA BORDOLOI W/O LALIT BORDOLOI, R/O MAHGAR, P.O.-JUMURMUR, DIST-NAGAON, PIN-782427, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010081682023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2211/2023
MS. REJINA DEKARAJA BORDOLOI
W/O LALIT BORDOLOI, R/O MAHGAR, P.O.-JUMURMUR, DIST-NAGAON, PIN-782427, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE
REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPTT., ASSAM SECRETARIAT, DISPUR, DIST-KAMRUP (M), GUWAHATI-781006, ASSAM
2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
NAGAON DISTRICT
NAGAON
PIN-782001
3:THE SELECTION BOARD FOR THE POST OF GAON PRADHAN OF
VARIOUS VILLAGES IN THE NAGAON DISTRICT
REPRESENTED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
NAGAON
ASSAM
4:UTPAL PATAR
S/O LATE GAKUL PATAR
R/O VILL-MAHGAR
P.O.-JUMURMUR
P.S.-KAMPUR
DIST-NAGAON
PIN-782427
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S R GOGOI, MS B DUTTA,J SAIKIA,C. SARMAH
Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, REVENUE, GA, ASSAM
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
06.02.2026 Heard Mr C Sarmah, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr J Handique, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1, and Ms M Bhattacharjee, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, Assam, appearing for the respondent Nos. 2 and 3.
2. None appears for the respondent No. 4, since petitioner did not take steps for service of notice upon the said respondent.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has made a submission that he is under instructions not to press this petition, in case, the petitioner is allowed the liberty to approach the appropriate authority under 162 (3) of Executive Instructions, to file an appeal.
4. The learned counsels for the respondents do not object to the said liberty being granted.
5. Accordingly, this writ petition is closed, granting the liberty as sought for in the petition.
6. The writ petition is disposed of.
7. The appeal may be filed by the petitioner within a period of 45 days from today. JUDGE Comparing Assistant