Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/6586/2022 of LUIT PATHAK Vs ASSAM HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION COUNCIL AND 3 ORS. on 3 February 2026
GAHC010204732022 2026:GAU-AS:1440 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6586/2022 LUIT PATHAK SON OF LATE KAMAKHYA PATHAK, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHATIPATHAR, P.O.- KHETRI, P.S.- KHETRI, DIST- KAMRUP(M), ASSAM, PIN- 782403. VERSUS
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010204732022
2026:GAU-AS:1440
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/6586/2022
LUIT PATHAK
SON OF LATE KAMAKHYA PATHAK,
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHATIPATHAR,
P.O.- KHETRI, P.S.- KHETRI,
DIST- KAMRUP(M), ASSAM,
PIN- 782403.
VERSUS
ASSAM HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION COUNCIL AND 3 ORS.
REP. BY THE ITS CHAIRMAN,
BHUBAN BHUYAN PATH,
NEAR ARUNADHA CINEMA HALL,
RAILWAY COLONY, BAMUNIMAIDAM,
GUWAHATI, ASSAM, PIN- 781021.
2:THE SECRETARY
ASSAM HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION COUNCIL
BHUBAN BHUYAN PATH
NEAR ARUNADHA CINEMA HALL
RAILWAY COLONY
BAMUNIMAIDAM
GUWAHATI
ASSAM
PIN- 781021
3:THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
ASSAM HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION COUNCIL
BHUBAN BHUYAN PATH
Page No.# 2/2
NEAR ARUNADHA CINEMA HALL
RAILWAY COLONY
BAMUNIMAIDAM
GUWAHATI
ASSAM
PIN- 781021
4:THE ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
ASSAM HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION COUNCIL
BHUBAN BHUYAN PATH
NEAR ARUNADHA CINEMA HALL
RAILWAY COLONY
BAMUNIMAIDAM
GUWAHATI
ASSAM
PIN- 78102
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S N TAMULI, MS. S. DUTTA,P DEKA
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, EDU,
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
04.02.2026 Mr S N Tamuli, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the matter does not require further adjudication, as it has become infructuous.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed as infructuous.
3. Writ Petition is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant