Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/3237/2018 of HARESWAR KALITA Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS. on 2 February 2026
GAHC010068702018 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3237/2018 HARESWAR KALITA S/O- DHARJYA RAM KALITA, R/O- HAHARA, P.O. PUTHIMARI, DIST- KAMRUP, ASSAM, PIN-781354 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS. REP. BY THE
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010068702018
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/3237/2018
HARESWAR KALITA
S/O- DHARJYA RAM KALITA, R/O- HAHARA, P.O. PUTHIMARI, DIST- KAMRUP, ASSAM, PIN-781354
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS.
REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY MINES AND MINERALS DEPTT., GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GHY-6
2:THE DIRECTOR OF GEOLOGY AND MINING
GOVT. OF ASSAM AT KAHILIPARA
DAKHINGAON
GHY-19
3:PENSION AND PUBLIC GRIEVANCES DEPTT.
GOVT. OF ASSAM
REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
DISPUR
GHY-
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B C CHOUDHURY, MR. D PHUKAN,MR. M SARMA
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM,
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
03.02.2026
Notice in the matter was issued on 23.05.2018. None appeared on 28.08.2023, 08.09.2023, 13.10.2023 and 03.01.2026. Mr. R. Dhar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents has submitted that he has specific instructions that the petitioner has received all pensionery benefits as admissible under the NPS Rules. In view of the non-appearance on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the submission that the petitioner has received all pensionery dues under the NPS, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner may not be interested in pursuing this litigation any further. In view of the above, this writ petition stands closed. However, petitioner shall be at liberty to revive the writ petition in case any grievance sought to be agitated in this writ petition remains.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant