Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/181/2026 of Sh. Lalremmawia Vs Smt. Thiangngaihlian and 4 Ors. on 7 October 2026
GAHC030007362026 THE GAUHATI
GAHC030007362026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/181/2026
Sh. Lalremmawia
S/o R. Khuma, R/o Chanmari West, Aizawl
VERSUS
Smt. Thianngaihlian and 4 Ors.
W/o Late Shri Gingothanga, R/o Edenthar, Aizawl 2:Master Khamfelsona 3:Miss Nianglianveli 4:Sh. Hmingthanzuala 5:Sh. Lalnunsang Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr Zoramchhana Advocate for the Respondent :
Linked Case : MACApp./26/2025
Lalremmawia
S/o R.Khuma
R/o Chanmari West
Aizawl
VERSUS
Smt Thianngaihlian and 4 Ors.
W/o Late Sh Gingothanga
R/o Edenthar
Aizawl
2:Master Khamfelsona
S/o Gingothanga
R/o Edenthar
Aizawl
3:Ms Nianglianveli
D/o Late Gingothanga
R/o Edenthar
Aizawl
4:Sh Hmingthanzuala
S/o Lalthlamuana
R/o Salem Veng
Aizawl
5:Sh Lalnunsanga
S/o C.Zohmachhuana
R/o Baktawng
Serchhip District
Mizoram
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr Zoramchhana Advocate for the Respondent : Mr B Vanlalnunkima
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
08.10.2026
Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard the learned counsel for respondent No. 5. This is an application under Order 22 of CPC read with Section 151 of CPC for substitution of the respondent No. 4 by his daughter namely, Mary Laldingngheti. It is stated that the respondent No. 4 has expired on 17.09.2024 and copy of the death certificate has also been annexed. It is further stated that it has come to the knowledge of the applicant that the respondent No. 4 is survived by his daughter namely Mary Laldingngheti who resides at Venghlui, Aizawl, Mizoram. Having regard to the above, the prayer for substitution is allowed. The respondent No. 4 shall stands substituted by his daughter namely Mary Laldingngheti who is to be impleaded as respondent No. 6. The applicant to file amended cause title. Accordingly, the application stands allowed and disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant