Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/182/2026 of Sh. Lalremmawia Vs Smt. Thianngaihlian and 4 Ors. on 7 October 2026
GAHC030007362026 THE GAUHATI
GAHC030007362026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/182/2026
Sh. Lalremmawia
S/o R. Khuma, R/o Chanmari West, Aizawl
VERSUS
Smt. Thianngaihlian and 4 Ors.
W/o Late Shri Gingothanga, R/o Edenthar, Aizawl 2:Master Khamfelsona 3:Miss Nianglianveli 4:Sh. Hmingthanzuala 5:Sh. Lalnunsang Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr Zoramchhana Advocate for the Respondent :
Linked Case : MACApp./26/2025
Lalremmawia
S/o R.Khuma
R/o Chanmari West
Aizawl
VERSUS
Smt Thianngaihlian and 4 Ors.
W/o Late Sh Gingothanga
R/o Edenthar
Aizawl
2:Master Khamfelsona
S/o Gingothanga
R/o Edenthar
Aizawl
3:Ms Nianglianveli
D/o Late Gingothanga
R/o Edenthar
Aizawl
4:Sh Hmingthanzuala
S/o Lalthlamuana
R/o Salem Veng
Aizawl
5:Sh Lalnunsanga
S/o C.Zohmachhuana
R/o Baktawng
Serchhip District
Mizoram
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr Zoramchhana Advocate for the Respondent : Mr B Vanlalnunkima BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
08.10.2026
Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard the learned counsel for respondent No. 5. None appears for respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3.
Respondent No. 4 has already expired. This I.A. has been preferred seeking condonation of delay of 651 days in preferring the connected application for substitution of the deceased/respondent No. 4. The reason for the delay as stated is that the applicant gained knowledge of the demise of the respondent No. 4 only on 26.06.2026 when his submission was made in this respect before the Court. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 5 has no objection to the condonation of the delay. Having regard to the above, the delay in preferring the connected application stands condoned and the I.A. stands allowed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant