Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/128/2026 of Smt. Lalnunmawii Vs Sh. Zosangzuala and 5 Ors. on 28 September 2026
GAHC030004372026 THE GAUHATI
GAHC030004372026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/128/2026
Smt. Lalnunmawii
W/o R. Laldinthara (L),
R/o Vengthlang, Champhai
VERSUS
Sh. Zosangzuala and 5 Ors.
S/o B. Lalremruata (L),
R/o Vengthlang, Champhai
2:The Secretary to the Government of Mizoram Land Revenue and Settlement Department Aizawl 3:The Director Land Revenue and Settlement Department
Champhai
4:The Settlement Officer
Land Revenue and Settlement Department
Champhai District
Champhai
5:Regional Business Office
State Bank of India
Babutlang
Aizawl
r/b the Assistant General Manager
6:State Bank of India
Champhai Branch
r/b its Manage
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr Lalfakawma
Page No.# 2/3
Advocate for the Respondent :
In FAO/2/2026
Smt. Lalnunmawii
W/o R. Laldinthara (L)
R/o Vengthlang
Champhai
VERSUS
Sh. Zosangzuala and 5 Ors.
S/o B. Lalremruata (L)
R/o Vengthlang
Champhai
2:The Secretary to the Government of Mizoram Land Revenue and Settlement Department Aizawl 3:The Director Land Revenue and Settlement Department Aizawl 4:The Settlement Officer Land Revenue and Settlement Department
Champhai
5:Regional Business Office
State Bank of India
Babutlang
Aizawl
r/b the Assistant General Manager
6:State Bank of India
Champhai Branch
r/b its Manager
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr Lalfakawma Advocate for the Respondent : Addl. AG/GA, Mizoram for R2, 3 & 4
Page No.# 3/3
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
29.09.2026
Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard the learned counsel for the respondents. It appears from the Order dated 17.09.2026 that nothing remains to be decided in the present I.A. filed by the petitioner/appellant and the learned counsel for the applicant also submits to the same effect. Hence, the present I.A. stands closed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant