Gauhati High Court

I.A.(Civil)/120/2026 of Smt. Sangluti and 2 Ors. Vs Sh. Vanlalrochhara and Anr. on 27 September 2026

GAHC030004052026 THE GAUHATI

GAHC030004052026

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/120/2026

Smt. Sangluti and 2 Ors.

D/o F. Neihkima

R/o Electric Veng

Aizawl

2: Sh. T.H. Lallawmkima

S/o T.H. Zarliana (L)

R/o Electric Veng

Aizawl

3: Smt. Zohmangaihi

D/o T.H. Zarliana (L)

R/o Electric Veng

Aizawl

VERSUS

Sh. Vanlalrochhara and Anr.

H/o M. Lalmuankimi

R/o Chaltlang

Aizawl

2:Smt. M. Lalmuankimi

W/o Vanlalrochhara

Page 1 of 4

Aizawl

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr Zoramchhana Advocate for the Respondent :

Linked Case : RFA/18/2026

Smt. Sangluti and 2 Ors.

D/o F. Neihkima, R/o Electric Veng, Aizawl2: Sh. T.H. Lallawmkima S/o T.H. Zarliana (L)

R/o Electric Veng

Aizawl

Page No.# 2/3

3: Smt. Zohmangaihi

D/o T.H. Zarliana (L)

R/o Electric Veng

Aizaw

VERSUS

Sh. Vanlalrochhara and Anr.

H/o M. Lalmuankimi, R/o Chaltlang, Aizawl 2:Smt. M. Lalmuankimi W/o Vanlalrochhara

Page 2 of 4

Aizaw

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr Zoramchhana Advocate for the Respondent :

BEFORE

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA

ORDER

28.09.2026

1. Heard Mr. Zoramchhana, learned counsel for the applicants/ appellants. Also heard Mr. A. Khamthianmanga, learned for the all the respondents/opposite parties.

2. This Interlocutory Application has been filed by the applicants in connection with RFA No. 18/2026 under Order XLI Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 praying for staying the execution of the Judgment & Decree dated

Page 3 of 4

12.03.2026 passed by the Court of learned Civil Judge (Senior Division)-VI, Aizawl in Civil Suit No. 23/2019.

3. By the impugned Judgment & Decree, the plaintiffs were also directed to return Rs. 18 Lakhs to the defendant with an interest @ 5% per annum from September, 2016. The contention of the applicants/ appellants in the connected appeal is that the said direction is beyond the pleadings of the parties and a said direction has been impugned in the connected Regular First Appeal. As such, a prayer or stay of execution of the directions given by the Trial Court in paragraph No. 33 of the impugned Judgment has been prayed for.

4. The learned counsel for the opposite parties submits that the opposite parties does not have any objection if during the pendency of the connected Regular First Appeal said direction is stayed.

5. Accordingly, the direction made by the Trial Court in paragraph No. 33 of the impugned Judgment & Decree is hereby stayed during the pendency of the connected Regular First Appeal and this Interlocutory Application is accordingly disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Page 4 of 4

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead