Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/178/2026 of Sh. F. Lalchhawnkima (L) R/b F. Lalmalsawmi and 6 Ors. Vs State of Mizoram and 7 Ors. on 23 September 2026
GAHC030007132024 THE GAUHATI
GAHC030007132024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/178/2026
Sh. F. Lalchhawnkima (L) R/b F. Lalmalsawmi and 6 Ors.
R/o Republic Vety Mual
Aizawl
Mizoram-796001
VERSUS
State of Mizoram and 7 Ors.
through Chief Secretary
Govt. of Mizoram
MINECO
Aizawl
Mizoram
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Jordan Rohmingthanga Advocate for the Respondent : Addl. AG/GA
Mizoram
Linked Case : WP(C)/127/2024
F. Lalchhawnkima (L) R/b his daughter F. Lalmalsawmi and 6 Ors.
R/o Republic Vety Mual, Aizawl Mizoram 796001. 2: F. Lawmkungi 3: Albert Laldinpuia 4: F. Lalawmpuii 5: Baby Lalhrilliani Fanai
6: F. Lalmalsawmi
7: Lalhmunmawi
VERSUS
State of Mizoram, through Chief Secretary, Govt. of Mizoram and 7 Ors.
Aizawl, Mizoram.
2:Directorate of Food
Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs
Through the Director
Govt. of Mizoram
3:Directorate of Food
Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs
Through the Deputy Director
4:Directorate of Food
Civil Supplies and Consumer Affaris
Through Secretary
Govt. of Mizoram
5:Finance Department Through the Secretary Govt. of Mizoram 6:Chief Controller of Accounts Accounts and Treasuries Govt. of Mizoram 7:Lalhlimpuii 8:Lalmuansang Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Jordan Rohmingthanga Advocate for the Respondent : Addl. AG/GA, Mizoram for R1-6
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 24-09-2026 Mr. Jordan Rohmingthanga, learned counsel appearing for the applicants. Also heard Ms. Vanneihsiami, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent Nos. 1 to 6. The present IA has been filed seeking an amendment to the cause title to the extent that the petitioner No. 1 may be struck off. The learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the petitioner No. 1 in the writ petition had been arrayed as a party since the other petitioners were seeking the relief of being granted family pension on the death of the petitioner No. 1. Having realized that a dead person cannot be made a party to the litigation, the learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the petitioner No. 1 be struck off and the matter be allowed to proceed with regard to the other petitioners. The learned counsel for the respondents does not object to the same. Accordingly, the petitioner No. 1, namely, F. Lalchhawnkima (L) shall stand deleted from the array of parties. However, it is provided that, for the sake of convenience, the serial numbers given to the petitioners shall remain the same. I.A. accordingly stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant