Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/171/2026 of Sh. Laltluangpuia and 38 Ors. Vs Union of India and 6 Ors. on 15 September 2026
GAHC030006922026 THE GAUHATI
GAHC030006922026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/171/2026
Sh. Laltluangpuia and 38 Ors.
S/o Laibuanga
Khankawn Village
P. O. Champhai
Pin 796321
2: Sh. S. Lalthlamuana
S/o Ronghaka
Khankawn Village
P. O. Champhai
Pin 796321
3: Smt. Zamani
W/o Kaplinga (L)
Khankawn Village
P. O. Champhai
Pin 796321
4: Sh. Laibuanga
S/o Kaplinga (L)
Khankawn Village
P. O. Champhai
Pin 796321
5: Sh. Rotluanga
S/o Awithangpa (L)
Khankawn VIllage
P. O. Champhai
Pin 796321
VERSUS
Union of India and 6 Ors.
Through the Secretary
Page 1 of 3
Ministry of Road Transport and Highways
New Delhi
Pin 110001
2:The Commander
GREF
Project Pushpak HQ
C/o 99 APO
Pin 9317xx
Aizawl
Mizoram
3:The Officer Commanding
74 RCC (GREF)
Zotlang
Champhai
Mizoram
Pin 796321
4:The State of Mizoram
Through the Secretary
Land Revenue and Settlement Department
Aizawl
Pin 796001
5:The Deputy Commissioner/District Collector Champhai District Mizoram Pin 796321
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Joseph Mangsuanhau Advocate for the Respondent :
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
ORDER
Date : 16.09.2026 (K.R. Surana, J) Heard Mr. Joseph Mangsuanhau, learned counsel for the applicants. Also
Page 2 of 3
heard Ms. Zairemsangpuii, learned CGC, representing respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3 and Mr. Samuel Vanlalhriata Chhangte, learned Addl. Advocate General for the State, representing respondent no.4.
2. By filing this interlocutory application, the applicants, who are the appellants in the connected WA No. 8 of 2026, have prayed for replacing of page no.4 of synopsis and page nos. 7 and 8 of the memo of appeal and to read documents as per index at sl. No. 6 and 7 and annexures at page nos. 220, 221 and 222.
3. The prayer made in this interlocutory application is allowed.
4. A separate order has been passed in connected I.A.(C) 175/2026.
5. The applicants have liberty to make the necessary amendments in the connected memo of appeal.
6. Accordingly, this interlocutory application stands allowed and disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…