Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/144/2025 of Sh. Basgo Muni Chakma and 4 Ors. Vs The Lai Autonomous District Council (LADC) and 6 Ors. on 31 August 2026
GAHC030007912025 THE GAUHATI
GAHC030007912025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/144/2025
Sh. Basgo Muni Chakma and 4 Ors.
S/o Ratna Kumar Chakma
R/o Tuikhurlui Village,
Lawngtlai District, Mizoram 2: Sh. Rajesh Kumar S/o Nilo Kumar R/o Tuikhurlui Village Lawngtlai District Mizoram 3: Sh. Kanjan Kumar S/o Berosen Chakma R/o Tuikhurlui Village Lawngtlai District Mizoram 4: Sh. Lokhi Ranjan S/o Pawdawn R/o TuikhurluiVillage Lawngtlai District Mizoram 5: Smt. Ranjan Devi D/o Sundor Muni Chakma R/o Tuikhurlui Village Lawngtlai District Mizora
VERSUS
The Lai Autonomous District Council (LADC) and 6 Ors.
r/b The Chief Executive Member, Lawngtlai, Mizoram 2:The Executive Member
i/c LAD
Lai Autonomous District Council (LADC)
Lawngtlai
Mizoram
3:The Local Administrative Officer
Lai Autonomous District Council (LADC)
Lawngtlai
Mizoram
4:Sh. Santosh Kumar
S/o Kine Chandro
R/o Tuikhurlui Village
Lawngtlai District
Mizoram
5:Sh. Banu Ranjan
S/o Kejori Ranjan
R/o Tuikhurlui Village
Lawngtlai District
Mizoram
6:Sh. Judha Muni
S/o Deva Mohan
R/o Tuikhurlui Village
Lawngtlai District
Mizoram
7:Sh. Santi Bihari
S/o Indrosen
R/o Tuikhurlui Village
Lawngtlai District
Mizora
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Lalpianfela Chawngthu Advocate for the Respondent : Mr. R. Lalhmunsiama for R1-3
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
01.09.2026
Heard Mr. Lalpianfela Chawngthu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. None appears for the respondents on call. Mr. Lalpianfela Chawngthu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that during the pendency of the writ petition, the matter has become infructuous and accordingly, seeks that the matter may be disposed of. In view of the aforesaid endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the writ petition stands dismissed on being infructuous.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant