Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Crl.)/51/2026 of Sh. Vanlalfela Vs The State of Mizoram and Anr. on 19 August 2026
GAHC030006022026 THE GAUHATI
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC030006022026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/51/2026
Sh. Vanlalfela
Zokhawthar, Champhai District
VERSUS
The State of Mizoram and Anr.
Aizawl2:A.S.I Biakchungnung
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr B Lalramenga Advocate for the Respondent : P.P./Addl.PP, Mizoram BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
20.08.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the respondent Nos. 1 & 2. This IA has been preferred seeking condonation of delay of 31 days in preferring the connected criminal appeal against the impugned Judgment & Order dated 14.05.2026 passed by the Fast Track Court, Kolasib District, Mizoram in SC(K) No. 15/2025.
Page No.# 2/2 The reasons for the delay have been explained at paragraph Nos. 3 & 4 of the instant IA, which I have perused. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that she has no objection to the condonation of the delay of 31 days . Having regard to the above, I am satisfied that the petitioner was prevented by sufficient cause from preferring the appeal within the period of limitation. Accordingly, the delay stands condoned. IA stands allowed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant