Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/65/2026 of The State of Mizoram R/b the Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram and 6 Ors. Vs Re. INTACH, R/b Mr. Rin Sanga, Convener of INTACH and 21 Ors. on 28 July 2026
GAHC030002392026 THE GAUHATI
GAHC030002392026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/65/2026
The State of Mizoram R/b the Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram and 6 Ors.
UD and PA
VERSUS
Re. INTACH
R/b Mr. Rin Sanga
Convener of INTACH and 21 Ors.
Zarkawt
Aizawl
Mizoram
Advocate for the Petitioner : Addl. AG/GA
Mizoram
Advocate for the Respondent :
Linked Case : PIL(Suo Moto)/2/2024
Re. INTACH
r/b Mr. Rin Sanga
Convener of INTACH
Zarkawt
Aizawl
Mizoram
VERSUS
The State of Mizoram r/b the Chief Secretary and 27 Ors.
Aizawl
Mizoram
2:The Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram
Land Revenue and Settlement Dept.
Aizawl
Mizoram
3:The Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram
UDandPA
Aizawl
Mizoram
4:The Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram
Home Dept.
Aizawl
Mizoram
5:The Deputy Commissioner
Aizawl District
Aizawl
Mizoram
6:The Superintendent of Police
Aizawl District
Aizawl
Mizoram
7:The Aizawl Municipal Corporation r/b the Municipal Commissioner Ch. Chhunga Bus Terminal Building Thuampui Veng Aizawl 8:The Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram Commerce and Industries Dept.
Aizawl
Mizoram
9:Dr. J. Lalramchhuanga
C -14/C
Ramhlun North
Aizawl.
10:Lalmuanpuia
B-10/2
Bawngkawn.
11:K.C Lalawmawia
CNB D-34/A
Chaltlang.
12:Lalchhandami
N 4/21
Bawngkawn.
13:Lalremsiama
S/o Kawlthankunga
R/o M-73/1
Ramhlun South
Aizawl
Ph. 9485358539.
14:Zohmingliani
W/o Peter V.L. Duha (L)
R/o G-50
Chanmari
Aizawl
Ph. 8259909066.
15:Lalliana
S/o Suahzachin (L)
R/o N5-47
Bawngkawn
Aizawl
Ph. 9856708011.
16:Lalramsanga
S/o Lawmzuala (L)
R/o N5-51
Bawngkawn
Aizawl
Ph. 9774610759.
17:Liantluanga Kawlni
S/o Lalsawia (L)
R/o Ramhlun North
Aizawl
Ph. 7005605960.
18:J. Zokailiana
S/o Singthanliana (L)
R/o N 5-44
Bawngkawn
Aizawl
Ph. 9862808981.
19:Lalmuanpuii
D/o Tlanglawma (L)
R/o T-2
Zuangtui
Aizawl
Ph. 7627997414.
20:Lalhmangaihzuali
w/o T. Lalchhuanmawia
R/o PHE Pump House Quarter
Bawngkawn
Aizawl
Ph. 8794015790.
21:C. Rothangi
W/o R. Tlanghmingthanga (L)
R/o N5-46
Bawngkawn
Aizawl
Ph. 8415009435.
22:Lalthanpuia
H/o Dr. M.S. Dawngliani
R/o N5-33A
Bawngkawn
Aizawl
Ph. 7005977364.
23:Ms. H. Zodinsangi
D/o Kapthianga (L)
R/o Zotlang
Aizawl.
24:Sh. Lalhruaisanga
S/o Phundinga (L)
R/o Chawntlangpui
Lawngtlai District
25:Ms. Hmingthanzuali
D/o Lungmuana
R/o H. No. A-1(A)/5
Chaltlang.
26:Dr. Vanlalhruaii
H/o Rorelkima
Ramhlun Venglai
27:Ms. Lallawmzuali
Bawngkawn Shalom Vengthar
28:Mr. Lalramthanga
Prop. Buhril Enterprise
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Joseph Lalchhanhima Renthlei (Amicus Curiae)
Advocate for the Respondent : Addl. AG/GA
Mizoram for R 1-6 & 8
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGEMENT
Date : 29.07.2026 (M. Zothankhuma, J)
1. Heard Ms. Linda L. Fambawl, learned Additional Advocate General, Mizoram, appearing for the applicants and Mr. Joseph Lalchhanhima, learned counsel, appearing for the opposite party No. 1. Also heard Mr. T. Lalnunsiama, learned counsel for the AMC.
2. This application by the State Government is to allow them to continue the project of construction of complete street design from Bawngkawn to Durtlang under the SASCI Scheme Part –XIII (2025-2026). She submits that the SASCI scheme is designed to promote pedestrianisation along the Bawngkawn and Durtlang roads by improving the footpath for public convenience, which would also include landscaping and beautification.
3. The learned counsel for the respondents submits that they have no objection if the prayer made in the application is allowed.
4. Considering the submissions of the learned counsels for the parties and keeping in view that the issue pertains to promoting pedestrianisation, by improving the footpath for public conveniences along the said road, we allow the said application.
5. IA is accordingly disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant