Gauhati High Court

I.A.(Civil)/138/2026 of Sh. C. Lalnunpuia Vs The State of Mizoram and 5 Ors. on 12 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC030002162025 THE GAUHATI

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

GAHC030002162025

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/138/2026 Sh. C. Lalnunpuia S/o Vanlalthlana R/o Govt. Complex Aizawl VERSUS The State of Mizoram and 5 Ors. Represented by the Chief Secretary Government of Mizoram Aizawl Mizoram 2:The Secretary to the Government of Mizoram Revenue Department 3:The Director Land Revenue and Settlement Mizoram Aizawl 4:The Settlement Officer Land Revenue and Settlement Department Aizawl District Mizoram Aizawl 5:Sh. Lalkamlova S/o Zalawta (L) C/o Lalngaihmawia Zote MJS R/o Zonuam

Aizawl Mizoram 6:Smt. Rinmawii D/o Robula (L) R/o Chanmari Aizawl Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. L.H. Lianhrima Sr.Adv. Advocate for the Respondent : Addl. AG/GA Mizoram for R1-R4

JUDGMENT / ORDER BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO Date : –

13.07.2026

Heard Mr. L. H. Lianhrima, learned senior counsel assisted by Ms. Ruth Lalruatfeli, learned counsel for the applicant, who submits that by filing this application, the applicant seeks the amendment of the Memo of Appeal insofar as the placement of the substantial question of law is concerned. He submits that the substantial question of law so formulated by the applicant has inadvertently been placed after the affidavit in the memo of appeal and therefore, he prays that he may be allowed to recast the same by placing it just after the grounds of appeal in the main memo of appeal. He also submits that the application have been filed in terms of the observation made by this Court vide order dated 23.06.2026 in the main appeal. Mr. Vanlaltanpuia, learned counsel for the respondent No.5 and Ms. Vanneihsiami, learned Government Advocate appearing for the official respondents have no objections to the prayer.

In view of above, the application for filing a recast memo of appeal in the manner stated by the learned senior counsel is hereby allowed. The applicant shall file a recast memo of appeal within a week. The applicant is also permitted to withdraw the certified copy of the impugned judgment and order. It is also made clear that since the Court fees has already been paid by the applicant prior to the recast, the applicant will not be required to submit fresh court fees in order to file recast memo of appeal. I.A. stands disposed of as allowed.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead