Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/127/2026 of Smt. Lalnunmawii Vs Sh. Zosangzuala and 5 Ors. on 2 July 2026
GAHC030004342026 THE GAUHATI
GAHC030004342026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/127/2026
Smt. Lalnunmawii
W/o R. Laldinthara (L),
R/o Vengthlang, Champhai
VERSUS
Sh. Zosangzuala and 5 Ors.
S/o B. Lalremruata (L),
R/o Vengthlang, Champhai
2:The Secretary to the Government of Mizoram 3:The Director 4:The Settlement Officer 5:Regional Business Office State Bank of India 6:The State Bank of India Champhai Branc Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr Lalfakawma Advocate for the Respondent :
Linked Case : FAO/2/2026
Smt. Lalnunmawii
W/o R. Laldinthara (L)
R/o Vengthlang
Champhai
VERSUS
Sh. Zosangzuala and 5 Ors.
S/o B. Lalremruata (L)
R/o Vengthlang
Champhai
2:The Secretary to the Government of Mizoram Land Revenue and Settlement Department Aizawl 3:The Director Land Revenue and Settlement Department Champhai District Champhai 4:The Settlement Officer Land Revenue and Settlement Department Champhai District Champhai 5:Regional Business Office State Bank of India Babutlang Aizawl r/b the Assistant General Manager 6:State Bank of India Champhai Branch r/b its Manager Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr Lalfakawma Advocate for the Respondent :
B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
03.07.2026
Heard Mr. Lalfakawma, learned counsel appearing for the applicant. The learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that steps by way of dasti upon the respondent Nos. 1, 5 & 6 has been effectuated on 24.06.2026 and 25.06.2026 respectively and an affidavit in respect of the same service of notice has been filed. On going through the contents of the affidavit and the document annexed there to, the service of notice upon respondent Nos. 1, 5 & 6 is deemed to be complete . However, there is no representation on behalf respondent Nos. 1, 5 & 6 the day before this Court. This is an application praying for condonation of 59 days in filing the connected FAO No. 2/2026. The learned counsel for the applicant has drawn our attention to the contents of the application at paragraph 2 and on going through the same we find that the reasonable explanation for the delay is available. Mrs. Caroline K. Lungawipuii, learned Govt. Advocate appearing for the respondent Nos. 2, 3 & 4 has submitted that the State does not have any objection to the condonation being granted. Accordingly, the prayer for the condonation of delay in filing the I.A. No. 127/2026 is hereby condoned. Registry to list the FAO on its turn. I.A accordingly disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant