Gauhati High Court
WA/18/2024 of Rochhara Chhangte Vs State of Mizoram and 4 Ors. on 8 June 2026
GAHC030007642024 THE GAUHATI
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC030007642024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WA/18/2024
Rochhara Chhangte
Inspector (AB), 2nd IR Battallion, Khawzawl, Mizoram
VERSUS
State of Mizoram and 4 Ors.
R/b the Chief Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram, Aizawl 2:The Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram 3:The Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram 4:The Director General of Police 5:The Chief Controller of Account Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms. Lalramengmawii Advocate for the Respondent : Addl. AG/GA, Mizoram
Page No.# 2/2
B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
09.06.2026 (M. Zothankhuma, J) Mr. A.R. Malhotra, learned counsel for the writ appeal submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the writ appeal, with liberty to file a fresh writ petition challenging Rule 13 of the Revision of Pay Rules, 2010. Mr. Samuel Vanlalhriata Chhangte, learned Addl. AG submits that he has got no objection to the prayer made by the appellant’s counsel. Keeping in view the fact that, Rule 13 of the 2010 Rules had not been put to challenge by the appellants in WP(C) 89/2023 or in the present appeal, we do not find any infirmity in the prayer made by the appellant’s counsel. The writ appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty given as prayed for, as per law.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant