Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/119/2024 of Sh. Immanuel Lalruatliana Vs State of Mizoram (R/b the Chief Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram) and 5 Ors. on 13 May 2026
GAHC030006902024 THE GAUHATI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC030006902024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/119/2024 Sh. Immanuel Lalruatliana S/o H.C. Lalkhuma R/o Vengthar, Khawzawl, Mizoram. VERSUS State of Mizoram (R/b the Chief Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram) and 5 Ors. Aizawl. 2:The Commissioner and Secretary Social Welfare and Tribal Affairs Women and Child Development Dept
3:The Director Women and Child Development Govt. of Mizoram
4:The Deputy Director (Adm.) Women and Child Development Govt. of Mizoram 5:Child Development Project Officer (CDPO) 6:Sh. Lalchhanchhuah Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Lalpianfela Chawngthu Advocate for the Respondent : Addl. AG/GA, Mizoram for R1-5
BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO O R D E R 14.05.2026 Heard Mr. L. Chawngthu, learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms.
Page No.# 2/2 Caroline K. Lungawipuii, learned Government Advocate for the State respondents and Mr. H. Zodinsanga, learned Legal Aid Counsel for respondent No.6.
2. At the outset, the parties have submitted that the matter was referred for mediation and during the course of the proceeding, the parties have come to an amicable settlement. In other words, the petitioner has accepted the post of ‘Ayah’ and that he has already joined the said post on 21.04.2026 as submitted by Mr. L. Chawngthu, learned counsel for the petitioner. In support of his submission, learned counsel has produced the office order dated 20.04.2026 by which the petitioner was appointed to the said post.
3. The attention of this Court has also been drawn to the mediation order-sheet dated 30.04.2026, wherein it has been recorded that parties have come to an amicable settlement as projected hereinabove.
4. In view of above, the writ petition stands closed.
5. The office order dated 20.04.2026, produced by Mr. L. Chawngthu, learned counsel for the petitioner shall be retained in the record and marked as ‘X’ for identification.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant