Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/29/2026 of Smt. Hmingchungnungi Vs Sh. H. Thangliana and 6 Ors. on 8 March 2026
GAHC030001272026 THE GAUHATI
GAHC030001272026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/29/2026
Smt. Hmingchungnungi
D/o Thuamliani
R/o Chanmari-I
Lunglei-796701
Lunglei District
Mizoram.
VERSUS
Sh. H. Thangliana and 6 Ors.
S/o Biakrawnsanga
R/o Lunglawn-796701
Lunglei District
Mizoram
2:Sh. Biakrawnsanga (Pasuia)
S/o Khuanglinga (L)
R/o Lunglawn - 796701
Lunglei District
Mizoram
3:The Mizoram Rural Bank
Lunglei Branch
Lunglei
Represented by its Branch Manager
4:The Chairman
Chief Executive Officer
Mizoram Rural Bank
5:The Chief Secretary
to the Government of Mizoram
6:The Secretary
Land Revenue and Settlement Department
Government of Mizoram
7:The Settlement Officer
Land Revenue and Settlement Department
Lunglei District
Lunglei
Government of Mizoram
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr Lalfakawma Advocate for the Respondent : Addl. AG/GA
Mizoram for R5-R7
Linked Case : RFA/29/2021
Smt. Hmingchungnungi
Chanmari-I
Lunglei
VERSUS
H. Thangliana and 4 Ors
Lunglawn
Lunglei
Mizoram
2:Biakrawnsanga
Lunglawn
Lunglei
5:The Chief Secretary Govt of Mizoram
Aizawl
6:The Secretary Land Revenue and Settlement Department Govt. of Mizoram Aizawl 7:The Settlement Officer LR and settlement Department Lunglei Lunglei Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr Lalfakawma Advocate for the Respondent : Mr C Zoramchhana (Addl.AG/GA
Mizoram) for R5
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 09.03.2026
Heard Ms. Lalropari, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Ms. Vanlalthlamuani, learned counsel, and Ms. Lalnunhlui, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of their respective Opposite Parties.
2. It is submitted that during the pendency of the appeal; the respondent No. 2, who is the father of the respondent No. 1 in the connected appeal, has passed away on 04.09.2023.
3. By way of filing this application under Section XXII Rule 4 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the applicant is seeking substitution of the name of the respondent No. 2 in the connected appeal, by the applicant who is his son.
4. The prayer so made by the applicant, has not been objected to by the Opposite Parties.
5. In view of the above, the prayer is allowed.
6. Let the name of the respondent No. 2 viz. Shri Biakrawnsanga (Pasuia), be substituted by the respondent No. 1 viz. Shri H. Thangliana, S/o Biakrawnsanga (Pasuia), in the connected appeal.
7. The interlocutory application accordingly stands allowed and disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant