Gauhati High Court

I.A.(Civil)/39/2026 of ZWO (Zofa Welfare Organization) r/b K. Darsailova, President, ZWO Vs The State of Mizoram r/b the Chief Secretary and 6 Ors. on 2 March 2026

GAHC030000882026 THE GAUHATI

GAHC030000882026

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/39/2026

ZWO (Zofa Welfare Organization) r/b K. Darsailova, President, ZWO

Mizoram Societies Registration Act, 2006 bearing Redg No. MSR-477 of 12.11.2007

of 2012

VERSUS

The State of Mizoram r/b the Chief Secretary and 6 Ors.

Aizawl, Mizoram

Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms. Rosalynn L Hmar Advocate for the Respondent : Addl. AG/GA, Mizoram Linked Case : PIL/3/2022

ZWO (Zofa Welfare Organization) R/b Rev. Robawia President ZWO

Aizawl

Mizoram

VERSUS

State of Mizoram and 6 Ors.

Aizawl

Mizoram

2:The Secretary/ Under Secretary

Home Department

Aizawl

Aizawl

Mizoram

3:The Chairman/ Secretary

Planning Programme and Implementation Department

Page 1 of 3

Aizawl

Mizoram

4:The Inspector General of Prison

Govt. of Mizoram

Aizawl

Mizoram.

5:Principal Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram Finance Dept.

Aizawl

Mizoram.

6:The Home Secretary

Ministry of Home Affairs

Govt. of India

North Block

Cabinet Secretariat

Raisina Hill

New Delhi

Pin- 110001.

Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms. Rosalynn L Hmar Advocate for the Respondent : Addl. AG/GA Mizoram BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS

ORDER

Date : 03.03.2026 (Budi Habung, J.)

Heard Ms. Rosalynn L. Hmar, learned counsel for the applicant.

This is an application under Order 1 Rule 10(2) read with Order 1 Rule 8A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, for impleadment of the names of 8(eight) parties mentioned in paragraph No. 2 of this application, as respondents in the connected PIL petition.

Page 2 of 3

The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the impleadment of the parties mentioned in paragraph No. 2 of this application, is necessary as they are the contractors who had carried-out the renovation work and construction projects of different jails in the State of Mizoram in terms of the approved designs, drawings and specifications.

Ms. Linda L. Fambawl, learned Addl. Advocate General, Mizoram, and Ms. Zairemsangpuii, learned CGC, appearing on behalf of their respective Opposite Parties, have no objection to the impleadment, as sought for by the applicant.

Prayer, as sought for, is allowed.

In view of the above, Registry shall implead the names of the parties mentioned in paragraph No. 2 of this interlocutory application as respondents No. 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 & 15 in the connected PIL.

The interlocutory application, accordingly, stands allowed and disposed of.

JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead