Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/83/2025 of Smt. Chawngthantluangi and 9 Ors. Vs The State of Mizoram r/b Chief Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram and 5 Ors. on 1 March 2026
GAHC030004352025 THE GAUHATI
GAHC030004352025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/83/2025
1. Smt. Chawngthantluangi and 9 Ors.
D/o Lalrawnliana, Tanhril, Aizawl.
2: Smt. R. Laldinpuii
3: Sh. Andrew Lalchullova
4: Sh. Vanlallura
5: Smt. Rebecca Lalnuntluangi
6: Sh. C.S Vanlalkunga
7: Smt. Lalhualhimi
8: Sh. Ramnunmawia
9: Smt. Rebecca Zirsangkimi
10: Smt. Lalnunzir
VERSUS
1. The State of Mizoram r/b Chief Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram and 5 Ors.
Aizawl
2:The Commissioner and Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram Finance Dept.
3:Commissioner and Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram DP and AR(ARW)
4:Commissioner and Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram Higher and Technical Education Dept.
5:Under Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram Higher and Technical Education Dept.
6:Director
Higher and Technical Education Dept
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr C Lalfakzuala Advocate for the Respondent : Addl. AG/GA, Mizoram for R1-6
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
02.03.2026
Ms. H. Lalrosangi, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that she has instruction to withdraw this writ petition as the matter has become infructuous. However, she submits that the petitioner No. 5 and 7 having acquired the requisite qualification have been allowed to retain their post as a part time Assistant Professor; therefore, they may be granted liberty to approach the authority for their continuation.
The prayer for withdrawal is allowed. The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. However, a liberty is given to the petitioner Nos. 5 and 7 to approach the appropriate authority for their further engagement in accordance with law. Mrs. Mary L. Khiangte, learned Government Advocate for the State is present.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant