Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/268/2026 of SMTI. KIHOLI SEMA Vs SHRI ANOOP KHINCHI, IAS AND ANR on 11 October 2026
GAHC020008432026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/268/2026 SMTI. KIHOLI SEMA SWEEPER (CASUAL), UNDER THE OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ZUNHEBOTO, NAGALAND VERSUS SHRI ANOOP KHINCHI, IAS AND ANR
GAHC020008432026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL
PRADESH)
KOHIMA BENCH
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/268/2026
SMTI. KIHOLI SEMA
SWEEPER (CASUAL), UNDER THE OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR, ZUNHEBOTO, NAGALAND
VERSUS
SHRI ANOOP KHINCHI, IAS AND ANR
COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND LAW, GOVT. OF NAGALAND, KOHIMA, NAGALAND
2:SHRI MOHAMMED ALI SHIHAB A
IAS
COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS DEPARTMENT
GOVT. OF NAGALAND. KOHIMA
NAGALAND
Advocate for the Petitioner : GRACE I NAMGI, Advocate for the Respondent : , Linked Case : COP(C)/39/2026
SMTI. KIHOLI SEMA
SWEEPER (CASUAL) UNDER THE OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR
ZUNHEBOTO
NAGALAND
VERSUS
SHRI ANOOP KHINCHI
IAS AND ANR
COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND LAW
GOVT. OF NAGALAND
KOHIMA
NAGALAND
2:SHRI MOHAMMED ALI SHIHAB A
IAS
COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS DEPARTMENT
GOVT. OF NAGALAND
KOHIMA
NAGALAND
------------
Advocate for : MOA JAMIR
Advocate for : appearing for SHRI ANOOP KHINCHI
IAS AND ANR
BEFORE
HONBLE MR JUSTICE NCHUMBEMO MOZHUI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
12/10/2026 Mr. Yangro Humtsoe, learned counsel for the petitioner. None appears for the respondent Nos. 1 & 2. The counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the instant application on the ground that there is some typographical error in the application. Prayer is allowed. The instant I.A is disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE Comparing Assistant