Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/96/2026 of SHRI LANGKHANG Vs THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 6 ORS on 4 October 2026
GAHC020004522026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : WP(C)/96/2026 SHRI LANGKHANG S/O LANGKHONG, R/O NEW PANGSHA VILLAGE, P.O. P.S. NOKLAK, DISTRICT - NOKLAK, NAGALAND - 798626 VERSUS THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 6 ORS
GAHC020004522026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL
PRADESH)
KOHIMA BENCH
Case No. : WP(C)/96/2026
SHRI LANGKHANG
S/O LANGKHONG, R/O NEW PANGSHA VILLAGE, P.O. P.S. NOKLAK, DISTRICT
- NOKLAK, NAGALAND - 798626
VERSUS
THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 6 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALAND, KOHIMA, NAGALAND - 797001
2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALAND
DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS
NAGALAND
KOHIMA - 797001
3:THE FINANCE COMMISSIONER
NAGALAND
KOHIMA - 797001
4:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY (PWD)
TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALAND
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (ROADS AND BRIDGES)
NAGALAND
KOHIMA - 797001
5:THE ENGINEER IN CHIEF
NAGALAND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
NAGALAND
KOHIMA - 797001
6:THE CHIEF ENGINEER
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (ROAD AND BRIDGES)
NAGALAND
KOHIMA - 797001
7:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
PUBLIC WORK DEPARTMENT (ROAD AND BRIDGES)
NOKLAK
NAGALAND - 79862
Advocate for the Petitioner : MANJONG KONYAK, CHOUNG, Advocate for the Respondent : GOVT ADV NL,
Page No.# 3/3
BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 05.10.2026
Mr. Choung, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instruction submits that the petitioner desires not to press the present writ petition in its present form. Accordingly, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to re-file the same. Prayer is not objected to by Ms. S. Chang, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the respondents. In view of the above submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal with liberty to the petitioner to re- file the same.
Sd/-
JUDGE Comparing Assistant