Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/224/2025 of SHRI TOSHIZEMBA Vs STATE OF NAGALAND AND 4 ORS on 28 September 2026
GAHC020007292025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : WP(C)/224/2025 SHRI TOSHIZEMBA JOINT DDIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF TREASURIES AND ACCOUNTS, KOHIMA NAGALAND VERSUS STATE OF NAGALAND AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC020007292025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL
PRADESH)
KOHIMA BENCH
Case No. : WP(C)/224/2025
SHRI TOSHIZEMBA
JOINT DDIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF TREASURIES AND ACCOUNTS, KOHIMA NAGALAND
VERSUS
STATE OF NAGALAND AND 4 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALAND, KOHIMA
2:THE ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY AND FINANCE COMMISSIONER
NAGALAND KOHIMA
3:THE PRINCIPAL DIRECTOR
TREASURIES AND ACCOUNTS
NAGALAND KOHIMA
4:THE DEPARTMENTAL PROMOTION COMMITTEE (DPC)
TREASURIES AND ACCOUNBTS DEPARTMENT
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN
NAGALAND KOHIM
Advocate for the Petitioner : TONGPOK PONGENER, AKUM
JAMIR,ASENLA S LKR,VIKEHIENUO VIMERHA,KETI
IMCHEN,OZUNGLILA,HADASHA RUANGMEI
Advocate for the Respondent : GOVT ADV NL,
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 29-09-2026 Heard Mr. Tongpok Pongener, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. S. Mere, learned Sr. Government Advocate for the State respondents. After attempting to argue the matter at length, Mr. Tongpok Pongener, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to re-file the same by incorporating the required challenges for enabling the petitioner to claim the relief sought for by him in the present writ petition.
Prayer is not objected to by the learned counsel for the respondents. In view of the above submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal with liberty, as prayed.
Sd/-
JUDGE Comparing Assistant