Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/183/2026 of THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 2 ORS Vs SHRI WORHONTHUNG EZUNG AND 2 ORS on 28 September 2026
GAHC020006742026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/183/2026 THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 2 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALAND, KOHIMA, NAGALAND. 2: THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC020006742026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL
PRADESH)
KOHIMA BENCH
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/183/2026
THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 2 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALAND, KOHIMA, NAGALAND.
2: THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALAND
DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS
NAGALAND KOHIMA.
3: THE FINANCE COMMISSIONER
GOVT. OF NAGALAND
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
NAGALAND KOHIM
VERSUS
SHRI WORHONTHUNG EZUNG AND 2 ORS
R/O H.NO. 50, SECTOR-F, TSAKU, MERIEMA, DISTRICT- KOHIMA, NAGALAND. PRESENTLY SERVING AS DEPUTY SECRETARY, NAGALAND
INFORMATION COMMISSION, KOHIMA, NAGALAND.
2:SMTI. SUNGTILA JAMIR
NCS
SECRETARY
NAGALAND INFORMATION COMMISSION
KOHIMA NAGALAND.
3:THE NAGALAND INFORMATION COMMISSION
KOHIMA
NAGALAND
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
Advocate for the Petitioner : GOVT ADV NL, Advocate for the Respondent : , Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 29-09-2026 Heard Mr. N. Angami, learned Sr. Government Advocate for the applicant and Mr. Pfoeskho, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party No.1/respondents. The present Interlocutory Application has been instituted praying for condonation of delay of 229 days in instituting the connected review petition. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. On considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant, as well as considering the projections made in the Interlocutory Application, this Court finds that the explanations set out are to be deemed to be sufficient for the purpose of explaining the delay occasioning in instituting the connected review petition. The learned counsel for the opposite party No. 1 has also not objected to the prayer of the applicant for condonation of delay. In view of the above, the delay of 229 days in filing the connected review petition stands condoned. With the above observations and directions, the present Interlocutory Application stands disposed of.
Sd/-
JUDGE Comparing Assistant