Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/143/2026 of SHRI SEYIENEKHO Vs THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 4 ORS on 22 September 2026
GAHC020004912026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/143/2026 SHRI SEYIENEKHO S/O THEPFUWHEKHOLIE R/O HOUSE NO. 20 TSIEPAMA VILLAGE CHUMOUKEDIMA NAGALAND VERSUS THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY
GAHC020004912026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL
PRADESH)
KOHIMA BENCH
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/143/2026
SHRI SEYIENEKHO
S/O THEPFUWHEKHOLIE
R/O HOUSE NO. 20
TSIEPAMA VILLAGE
CHUMOUKEDIMA
NAGALAND
VERSUS
THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 4 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALAND
KOHIMA
NAGALAND
2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE
NAGALAND
KOHIMA - 797001
3:THE PRINCIPAL DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE
NAGALAND
KOHIMA - 797001
4:THE CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER
DIMAPUR
NAGALAND.
5:SMTI. NEISASIENO
C/O TSIEPAMA SUB CENTRE
CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER
DIMAPUR UNDER THE HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT.
------------
For the Applicant(s) : Mr. Hisinlo Himb, Advocate
For the Respondent(s) : Ms. A. Ayemi, Government Advocate : Mr. L. Iralu, Advocate BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
HONBLE MRS JUSTICE HELEN DAWNGLIANI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 23.09.2026
(Devashis Baruah, J)
This is an application for stay of the impugned judgment and order dated 22.05.2026 passed in WP(C) No.145/2025.
2. Vide the impugned judgment and order dated 22.05.2026, the writ petition being WP(C) No.145/2025 was dismissed. Under such circumstances, seeking a stay of a dismissal order is totally misconceived.
3. Under such circumstances, the instant application is misconceived and accordingly, it stands rejected.
4. Be that as it may, in spite of rejection of the instant application, we observe that the appointment of the private Respondent shall be subject to the outcome of the accompanying Writ Appeal.
J U D G E J U D G E Comparing Assistant